Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add marsmike/feinschmiede --skill excalidrawgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marsmike/feinschmiedeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/marsmike/feinschmiede/excalidraw)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marsmike/feinschmiede/excalidraw"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marsmike/feinschmiede/excalidraw/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marsmike/feinschmiede/excalidraw"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marsmike/feinschmiede/excalidraw.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00578 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00289 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
excalidraw scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
feinbild — Excalidraw diagrams
Quick Start
/excalidraw flow.exc.dsl
feinbild is a command on your PATH. Expand a .exc.dsl to .excalidraw
(brand colors resolved), then render to PNG.
feinbild excalidraw expand flow.exc.dsl --brand feinschliff # -> flow.excalidraw
feinbild excalidraw render flow.excalidraw # -> flow.png
feinbild verify flow.excalidraw # lint: overflow, overlap, label collision
Primitives: box ellipse diamond dot line zone lane text and
arrow <from> -> <to> [label:"…"]. Set theme dark in the DSL for a dark
canvas. --brand selects the brand; render is brand-agnostic.
Default to clean
- ≤3 arrows per flow. More than that means the layout is wrong — re-chunk or pick another visualization.
- No text over shapes. Labels live inside boxes or adjacent via a connector — never on a border.
- Aspect-aware. Default 16:9 (1920×1080). If the brief specifies a target slot match it; otherwise embeds get squished.
- Metaphor, not clutter. Briefs saying "messy" / "tangled" / "stitched" describe a CONCEPT — convey via composition (overlap, dim color, tight grouping), not by drawing actual chaos.
References
- Methodology — argue-not-display patterns, depth assessment, hierarchy & arrow-routing rules
- DSL syntax — full grammar: primitives, zone/lane, arrow flags, ports, colors, text levels
- Design system — audience-calibrated complexity, visual vocabulary, 10 arrow-discipline principles
- Examples — fan-out / pipeline-with-decision / multi-zoom blueprints
- Deep examples — large layered architectures (MCU/Linux stacks, OTA flows, audience-contrast pairs); source DSL in
examples/ - Eval fixtures live in
evals/evals.json; reusable DSL fixtures inexamples/*.exc.dsl
Brand override
Override: inline @brand <name>, then --brand, then FEINSCHLIFF_BRAND. expand resolves brand colors; render is brand-agnostic.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- evals/evals.json 1.7 KB
- examples/embedded-linux-runtime-stack.exc.dsl 6.2 KB
- examples/embedded-mcu-firmware-stack.exc.dsl 6.4 KB
- examples/linux-mcu-heterogeneous-device.exc.dsl 6.3 KB
- examples/ota-update-medium-executive.exc.dsl 2.0 KB
- examples/ota-update-simple-pupil.exc.dsl 645 B
- examples/secure-boot-ota-ab-flow.exc.dsl 6.5 KB
- references/design-system.md 6.0 KB
- references/dsl-syntax.md 7.3 KB
- references/examples-deep.md 4.6 KB
- references/examples.md 4.6 KB
- references/methodology.md 10 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 46 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 7f59aad694a1
excalidraw is a skill published in the GitHub repository marsmike/feinschmiede (3 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 578 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
creo-design-review
Comprehensive UI/UX design review with Playwright. Evaluates responsive design (375-1920px), WCAG AA accessibility, Nielsen's 10 heuristics, component consistency, and visual polish. Trigger keywords: design review, UI review, accessibility audit, responsive check, heuristic evaluation.
creo-ux-competitor
Analyze competitor websites for UX patterns, strengths, and weaknesses. Navigates external URLs, documents UX patterns, evaluates against Nielsen heuristics, and extracts actionable learnings. Trigger keywords: competitor analysis, competitor UX, competitive analysis, benchmark, compare competitors.
creo
Comprehensive design, UX, content, DevOps, and testing toolkit for web applications. Design reviews, UX flow analysis, marketing content, SEO auditing, CI/CD pipelines, test orchestration, performance optimization, and marketing site creation. Triggers on: /creo, design review, UX analysis, marketing content, SEO…
creo-design-implement
Execute design fixes from review reports with high-quality code modifications. Implements responsive design corrections, accessibility improvements, component consistency fixes, and visual polish. Trigger keywords: design implement, fix design, implement review, responsive fix, accessibility fix.
creo-marketing-site
Seven-stage marketing site creation orchestration. Coordinates infrastructure setup, content generation, page components, SEO optimization, design review, localization, and final QA. Delegates to specialized agents for each stage. Trigger keywords: marketing site, marketing website, orchestrate, site creation, landing…
republic-design
Republic-style UX design reviewer and scorer for pitch decks, landing pages, and investor-facing materials. Applies Republic.com's design DNA (financial-grade trust, data-forward, restrained elegance) to score and improve any visual artifact. Use when user says "republic", "republic style", "score design", "polish…