parsing-trial-eligibility

parsing-trial-eligibility is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from maziyarpanahi/openmed. It costs 152 tokens per session (1,990 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A tool for turning the free-text eligibility rules of a clinical trial into structured inclusion and exclusion checks, then comparing those checks with patient facts extracted by OpenMed. ClinicalTrials.gov is a public registry of clinical studies.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to parse ClinicalTrials.gov eligibility text, screen a synthetic patient against trials, and identify missing facts. It supports review and does not enroll patients or make final clinical decisions.
Why use it?
Trial requirements are often written as a long paragraph, which is hard for software to evaluate consistently. It shows whether each rule is met, not met, or unknown, with a reason for review.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Part of the openmed-skills plugin — 74 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to parse ClinicalTrials.gov eligibility text, screen a synthetic patient against trials, and identify missing facts. It supports review and does not enroll patients or make final clinical decisions.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/maziyarpanahi/openmed/parsing-trial-eligibility
About the project

OpenMed is local-first healthcare AI software that extracts clinical information and removes personally identifying details from clinical text on hardware controlled by the user. Healthcare developers use its Python runtime, Apple Silicon and mobile SDKs, and browser support for on-device clinical NER and PII de-identification.

maziyarpanahi/openmed · 5,302 stars · on GitHub · openmed.life

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add maziyarpanahi/openmed --skill parsing-trial-eligibility
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/maziyarpanahi/openmed

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install openmed-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 74 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for parsing-trial-eligibility

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/maziyarpanahi/openmed/parsing-trial-eligibility/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/maziyarpanahi/openmed/parsing-trial-eligibility)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/maziyarpanahi/openmed/parsing-trial-eligibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/maziyarpanahi/openmed/parsing-trial-eligibility/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for parsing-trial-eligibility

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/maziyarpanahi/openmed/parsing-trial-eligibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/maziyarpanahi/openmed/parsing-trial-eligibility.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 152 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,990 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00152 $0.01990
Opus 5 $0.00076 $0.00995
Sonnet 5 $0.00030 $0.00398
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00199

Measured 12d ago against content hash 2fddebb4e829, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

parsing-trial-eligibility scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/parsing-trial-eligibility/SKILL.md · 166 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Parsing trial eligibility & matching patients

A ClinicalTrials.gov study exposes its eligibility as a single free-text block (protocolSection.eligibilityModule.eligibilityCriteria) plus a few typed fields (sex, minimumAge, maximumAge, healthyVolunteers). This skill turns that prose into structured inclusion / exclusion criteria and matches each rule against patient facts that OpenMed extracted — producing an explainable eligible | ineligible | unknown verdict per criterion.

This is decision support, not enrollment. The output is a candidate list and a rationale for a clinician to review, never an automated eligibility decision.

When to use

  • You pulled a study with searching-clinicaltrials and need its eligibility as machine-readable rules.
  • You have a (synthetic) patient profile and want to screen it against one or many trials, with a per-criterion reason.
  • You want to highlight which patient facts are missing to decide a criterion.

Quick start

The typed gates are deterministic — apply them first. The free-text criteria need parsing into bullet-level inclusion/exclusion items.

# Study from ClinicalTrials.gov v2 (see searching-clinicaltrials)
elig = study["protocolSection"]["eligibilityModule"]

raw = elig["eligibilityCriteria"]            # free text, often markdown bullets
sex = elig.get("sex", "ALL")                 # ALL | FEMALE | MALE
min_age = elig.get("minimumAge")             # e.g. "18 Years"
max_age = elig.get("maximumAge")             # e.g. "75 Years"
healthy_ok = elig.get("healthyVolunteers")   # bool

def split_criteria(text: str) -> dict[str, list[str]]:
    """Split the prose into inclusion / exclusion bullet lists."""
    sections, current = {"inclusion": [], "exclusion": []}, None
    for line in text.splitlines():
        low = line.strip().lower()
        if "inclusion criteria" in low:
            current = "inclusion"; continue
        if "exclusion criteria" in low:
            current = "exclusion"; continue
        bullet = line.strip(" -*•\t")
        if bullet and current:
            sections[current].append(bullet)
    return sections

criteria = split_criteria(raw)

Read the full file on GitHub · 166 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 166 lines · 152 tokens per session scan A 2fddebb4e829

Subscribe to this mod's changes

parsing-trial-eligibility is a skill published in the GitHub repository maziyarpanahi/openmed (5,302 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 152 tokens to every session and 1,990 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

benchmarking

Use this skill when the user wants to benchmark an MLX-VLM change and present the numbers in a PR — fork-vs-main A/B comparisons, isolated-module micro-benchmarks, median-of-N timing with warmup, peak-memory reporting, correctness checks, parameter sweeps, and self-contained reproducible bench scripts to paste into a…

Blaizzy/mlx-vlm · 74 tokens

drug-discovery

Drug discovery: ChEMBL search, drug-likeness, interactions.

NousResearch/hermes-agent · 19 tokens

server-inference

Use this skill when the user wants to run or debug MLX-VLM server inference, including uv run mlxvlm.server, /v1/models, /v1/chat/completions, /v1/responses, streaming, OpenAI-compatible clients, health checks, metrics, model unload/reload, adapters, trust-remote-code, and server request/response failures.

Blaizzy/mlx-vlm · 80 tokens

imaging-data-commons

Query and download public cancer imaging data from NCI Imaging Data Commons using idc-index. Use for accessing large-scale radiology (CT, MR, PET) and pathology datasets for AI training or research. No authentication required. Query by metadata, visualize in browser, check licenses.

synthetic-sciences/openscience · 62 tokens

paper-revision-author

Revise independently drafted paper sections into one coherent LaTeX body before the abstract is written.

opensquilla/opensquilla · 24 tokens

molecular-cloning

Molecular cloning simulation and design. PCR amplicon prediction, restriction enzyme digestion, Golden Gate and Gibson assembly simulation, primer design, CRISPR sgRNA design, and plasmid annotation. For protein-level sequence analysis use biopython or esm; for database lookups use gene-database or ensembl-database.

synthetic-sciences/openscience · 70 tokens