mitigation-recommend

mitigation-recommend is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from microsoft/cat-agent-skills. It costs 82 tokens per session (665 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A deterministic decision step for a mapped supply shortage. It chooses whether to expedite, use a substitute or reschedule, then identifies the urgency and people who must be notified.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after the shortage's effects are mapped to recommend the next action, calculate the escalation tier and produce the owner-notification list.
Why use it?
It turns shortage information into a defined response instead of leaving teams to decide manually. It also makes escalation responsibilities explicit.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex ✓ vendor

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it after the shortage's effects are mapped to recommend the next action, calculate the escalation tier and produce the owner-notification list.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/mitigation-recommend
About the project

microsoft/cat-agent-skills is a static website that catalogs reusable instruction sets and related packages for AI agents. People use it to search, filter, rate, and download skills for Cowork, Copilot Studio, and Scout, along with Copilot plugins and Scout automations. The catalogue entries are the skills, instructions, plugins, and settings displayed by the site.

microsoft/cat-agent-skills · 93 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add microsoft/cat-agent-skills --skill mitigation-recommend
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/cat-agent-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for mitigation-recommend

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/mitigation-recommend/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/mitigation-recommend)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/mitigation-recommend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/mitigation-recommend/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for mitigation-recommend

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/mitigation-recommend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/mitigation-recommend.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 82 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 665 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00082 $0.00665
Opus 5.5 $0.00033 $0.00266
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00133
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00067

Measured today against content hash e65a78107e74, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

mitigation-recommend scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/mitigation_recommend.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

submissions/supplier-disruption/skills/mitigation-recommend/SKILL.md · 57 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Mitigation Recommend

Purpose

Deterministically choose the mitigation — expedite, substitute or reschedule — from the impact summary and the supply position (substitutes, alternate suppliers, lead time, single-source flag, supplier history), set the urgency, build the cumulative owner-notification list, and raise the governance escalations — then finalize the recommended next-best action.

When to use

  • After shortage-impact-map, in every run.
  • "Should we expedite or substitute, and who do we escalate to?".

Inputs

  • The contract payload with impact_summary{} (worst_severity, first_impact_date, total qty at risk) and supply{} (substitutes, alternates, single_source) and history.chronic_pattern (contract mfg.supplier-disruption.v1).

Steps

  1. Validate the payload against the contract.
  2. Run scripts/mitigation_recommend.py --impact impact-map.json --out disruption-packet.json.
  3. Do not restate or recompute the mitigation choice or the escalations in prose; quote the engine output verbatim.
  4. Emit the {mitigation, notifications} contract payload and the finalized next_best_action.

Output

Contract mfg.supplier-disruption.v1 with a populated mitigation{} (option, urgency, actions, substitute_part/alternate_supplier, confidence, source=engine:mitigation_recommend), a notifications[] owner list, and appended escalations[] plus the finalized next_best_action — the {mitigation} hop.

Grounding requirements

The mitigation choice cites references/mitigation-escalation-rules.md #1; the urgency cites #2; each escalation cites #3; each notification cites #4.

Constraints

  • All mitigation/escalation logic happens in the engine. The model must never choose the mitigation or escalate itself.
  • Draft-first: the plugin drafts the mitigation and notifications; it never expedites, substitutes, reschedules or emails on its own. A buyer/planner confirms.
  • Never suppress a customer-order (late_shipment) escalation or a chronic-supplier escalation because of time pressure.

Read the full file on GitHub · 57 lines

Files

What ships with it

7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 57 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A e65a78107e74

Subscribe to this mod's changes

mitigation-recommend is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/cat-agent-skills (93 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 665 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-28.