Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mimfort/rag_for_git --skill solve-taskgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mimfort/rag_for_gitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mimfort/rag_for_git/solve-task)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mimfort/rag_for_git/solve-task"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mimfort/rag_for_git/solve-task/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mimfort/rag_for_git/solve-task"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mimfort/rag_for_git/solve-task.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Prompt Injection · line 46 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- high Prompt Injection · line 97 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.02088 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00835 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00418 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00209 |
Grade A, and why
solve-task scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Solve Task
Gather the right context for a task, distill it into a brief, then enter the normal development
workflow. This skill does NOT plan or implement — it disciplines context-gathering and hands the
brief to superpowers:brainstorming (which leads to writing-plans → subagent-driven-development,
or the execution strategy chosen in the startup survey (inline / subagent / lite)).
Inputs
$ARGUMENTS is either:
- a task key (e.g.
PRI-4, matching the board'skey_pattern), or - a free-text description (e.g. "add a logout endpoint").
Pipeline
-
Startup: survey + Preflight (index freshness + task-corpus warm-up). Run this BEFORE anything else. First resolve, once, the repo path (
git rev-parse --show-toplevel) and the working branch (git branch --show-current; if it is inREVIEW_BRANCHESuse it, else the primary branch) — step 3 reuses the same branch forsearch_codebase.Resolve
task_boardexactly once before any board call. Read the repo.review.ymlblock: itstask_boardmapping has priority; an absent block falls back toget_board_config(); an explicit emptytask_board:disables board work for this run. Keep the resolved{type, project, key_pattern, create_target, done_target, options}value and reuse this resolved value in Step 1 and every board operation. Never call the deploy fallback when the repo explicitly disables the board.Call
prepare_task_context(repo, key, branch, warm_board=True)once here — pass the resolvedkeywhen$ARGUMENTSmatcheskey_pattern, else board-less: pass the user's formulation verbatim askey(the tool'skeyparameter is required and accepts free text when no board key matches). It folds the manual round trips below into one deterministic call and returns a single payload:preflight(branch, indexed_sha, drift, summaries, chunks, graph_nodes — feeds Step 0.1/0.4 below),task_board/task(feeds Step 2),related/subsystems/code/test_exemplars(feeds Step 3),gaps(a list of{section, reason, cause, cause_detail, remedy}— branch on whethercauseisunknown, not on one non-unknownvalue; the classes arestorage_unavailable|embedder_unavailable, andcause_detailrefinesstorage_unavailableonly (auth_failed|missing_database|pool_exhausted|null); copy every entry into Constraints / open questions in the Step 4 brief verbatim) andwarnings(surface to the user). No source failure raises — a failed section just adds agapsentry, so the steps below stay fail-open.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 75770cb33674
- 1mo ago First seen · 131 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A 7b1e2eb34ca5
solve-task is a skill published in the GitHub repository mimfort/rag_for_git (20 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 2,088 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-knowledge-graph
Codebase'i knowledge graph olarak analiz et. Dependency, call graph, hotspot analizi.
m1nd-first
Use when investigating a repository, searching for implementation, reviewing changes, working from specs/docs, or preparing a risky code change in an environment where m1nd is available. This doctrine makes m1nd the first investigative layer before grep, glob, or manual file reads, except when the task is pure…
coograph-review
Strict read-only review of the current changes for spec compliance, convention violations, logic bugs, and architecture. Every finding cites a verbatim quote from a fresh file read. Use after implementation, before declaring done.
graphenium
Use when analyzing codebase structure, verifying pre-flight policy compliance, tracing transitive dependency closures, or auditing post-edit scope creep.
celmis-search
Search and read code through Celmis instead of grepping or cat-ing whole repositories. Use when you need where a symbol is defined, who calls it, what a file or module contains, how another service does something ("make a DB connection like in service X", "do authorization the way service X does", "how does X load its…
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.