Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mmTheBest/Research-Architect --skill research-architect-evidencegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mmTheBest/Research-ArchitectWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mmthebest/research-architect/research-architect-evidence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mmthebest/research-architect/research-architect-evidence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mmthebest/research-architect/research-architect-evidence/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mmthebest/research-architect/research-architect-evidence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mmthebest/research-architect/research-architect-evidence.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.01010 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00505 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00202 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
research-architect-evidence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Research Architect Evidence and Claim Architecture
Organize executed material into claims that remain inside their evidence and inference boundaries.
Inputs and blocking rule
Read when available:
paper_output/confirmed_research_spine.md
paper_output/study_design_brief.md
paper_output/analysis_plan.md
paper_output/evaluation_plan.md
paper_output/study_component_registry.md
paper_output/terminology_ledger.md # when present
paper_output/exemplar_adaptation_plan.md # when target references exist
user-supplied results, sources, analyses, observations, or draft claims
If no verifiable evidence or argumentative material exists, create paper_output/execution_plan.md using ../research-architect/templates/execution_plan.md, identify the next executable actions, and stop before drafting. Do not let a renamed task list substitute for evidence readiness.
Shared resources and outputs
Read ../research-architect/references/claim-evidence-framework.md. When the
manuscript has multiple claim-bearing displays, also read
../research-architect/references/display-system-planning.md. Use the
following CSV files only as column contracts; write Markdown artifacts in
paper_output/:
../research-architect/templates/evidence_bank.csv
../research-architect/templates/claim_register.csv
../research-architect/templates/evidence_display_map.csv
Create:
paper_output/evidence_bank.md
paper_output/claim_register.md
paper_output/display_system_plan.md # for multi-display manuscripts
paper_output/evidence_display_map.md
paper_output/claim_strength_calibration.md
paper_output/result_interpretation_notes.md
For guided depth, produce the evidence bank, claim register, and only the display/interpretation information needed to make a next decision. standard and deep add the complete display and calibration trail.
Every central claim must resolve to evidence IDs, citation IDs, or an explicit limitation; record exact locators, contradictory/null/negative material, and verification status. Use canonical terms and stable Object IDs from the terminology ledger where names alone are ambiguous.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 86 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 3f86b2467820
research-architect-evidence is a skill published in the GitHub repository mmTheBest/Research-Architect (68 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,010 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-writer
Medical/scientific paper writing workflow skill. Manages the full pipeline from literature search to submission-ready manuscript. Creates and manages a project directory with IMRAD-format section files, literature matrix, reference management, and quality checklists. Supports both English and Japanese papers.…
food-research
Run a comprehensive, multi-source literature and evidence-synthesis workflow for food & nutrition science. Use when the user wants to research a food/nutrition topic in depth, do a literature review, build an evidence brief, screen and synthesize many sources, verify citations, or scope a systematic review.…
food-paper
Multi-subagent manuscript system for food & nutrition science covering the whole research process: understand the field, frame research questions, curate and analyze data, run statistics, build figures and tables, construct the discussion, draft, polish, and self-review — journal-aware throughout. Includes a…
food-pipeline
Master orchestrator for the whole food & nutrition research-to-publication workflow. Coordinates the specialist skills — each with its own subagent set — into one governed path: journal selection, research (food-research / food-deep-research), writing & analysis (food-paper), figures (food-figure), peer review…
food-deep-research
General-purpose deep research that produces a fully written, source-validated literature review on any question: scope it, design the method, discover and screen sources by journal ranking, validate every source, extract and verify evidence, synthesize, stress-test, then write and format the review (APA 7.0 by…
food-figure
Comprehensive figure system for food & nutrition manuscripts: analyzes the user's data, recommends the best figure(s) to make, then produces submission-grade graphics in Python or R at the target journal's spec. Handles all common scientific figure types (bar/box/violin, line/kinetic, scatter/regression, Bland–Altman…