Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to monarch-initiative/dismech. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/monarch-initiative/dismech/main/.claude/skills/dismech-pr-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/monarch-initiative/dismechWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/monarch-initiative/dismech/dismech-pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/monarch-initiative/dismech/dismech-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/monarch-initiative/dismech/dismech-pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/monarch-initiative/dismech/dismech-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/monarch-initiative/dismech/dismech-pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.05802 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02901 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00580 |
Grade A, and why
dismech-pr-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -sG "https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi" \ How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 425 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Review Skill
Use this skill to review or draft curation guidance and to QA disorder entries for correctness, specificity, and schema alignment.
Use all appropriate skills. What follows are some specific guidelines aimed to catch common suboptimal things we see in PRs a lot. This list is not complete and you should always consult skills and comparable entries.
IMPORTANT: check for silent reversions when the PR owner has resolved conflicts
Although your primary objective is to evaluate the biological and clinical content of PRs, you MUST be vigilant for cases where the committed has botched a rebase or merge arising from merge conflict resolution (usually in cache files). You should also try ensure that all changes in the PR are in scope. If files are touched that are not relevant to the original request this is a warning sign.
If in doubt, mark the PR as being review-required, and assign to cmungall.
If the author truly did intend to include changes that seem out of scope, they will label the PR as scope-override.
If you see a massive number of files touched and these are not relevant, this is a sure sign something has gone horribly wrong. Flag the PR assign to cmungall and stop.
Typically conflicts arise from difference in cache files. We don't really care so much how these are resolved as they are derived files. More care should be taken when looking at conflicts resolution in anything authored, whether it is yaml, python, markdown etc.
If the case seems nuanced, consult issue #1430 for further guidance.
Trust the Validation Process
Do NOT second-guess deterministic validation.
The dismech CI pipeline runs just validate-disorders on every PR's changed disorder files, which batches schema, ontology-term, and reference/snippet validation in one pass. If a file passes those checks, it is schema-valid and structurally correct. The reviewer's job is NOT to re-inspect the output of these checks — that is redundant and leads to false positives.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 425 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 773e1fe0b89c
dismech-pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository monarch-initiative/dismech (61 stars, last pushed today), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 5,802 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
robot-obo-tool
Skills for using ROBOT, the OBO ontology command-line toolkit for reasoning, template-based term creation, quality control, format conversion, and ontology manipulation. Use this when working with OWL/OBO ontologies that need automated processing.
dosdp-design-patterns
Skills for understanding and applying DOSDP (Dead Simple Ontology Design Patterns) to ensure consistent ontology term creation and maintenance. This skill is about recognizing patterns and ensuring consistency, not using dosdp-tools directly.
editing-obo-ontologies
Skills and tools for editing OBO format ontologies, including querying terms, checking out/checking in individual terms, and following OBO format conventions. Do not use this if the source for the ontology you are editing is not in obo format (e.g. ofn).
ontology-access-kit
Skills for querying ontologies using the Ontology Access Kit (OAK). This should only be used for complex ontology operations, for basic external ontology searching use the OLS MCP.
pr-review-triage
Watch open PRs, check CI status, review staleness, merge conflicts, and unanswered review comments. Produces a prioritized watchlist.
cuopt-numerical-optimization-formulation
LP, MILP, QP — concepts, problem-text parsing, and formulation patterns (parameters, constraints, decisions, objective). Concepts only; no API.