Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to monarch-initiative/dismech. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/monarch-initiative/dismech/main/.claude/skills/dismech-references/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/monarch-initiative/dismechWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/monarch-initiative/dismech/dismech-references)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/monarch-initiative/dismech/dismech-references"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/monarch-initiative/dismech/dismech-references/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/monarch-initiative/dismech/dismech-references"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/monarch-initiative/dismech/dismech-references.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.08421 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.03368 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.01684 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00842 |
Grade A, and why
dismech-references scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 707 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Curate Evidence and References
Use this workflow whenever evidence or its cited source changes.
Non-negotiable rules
- Quote an exact substring of the cited source. Do not paraphrase or fabricate a
snippet. - Confirm that the quote substantively supports the precise claim. A matching string from the wrong paper, or an unrelated sentence from the right paper, is not evidence.
- Prefer a result sentence from the abstract or authoritative source record. A paper title usually establishes only that a topic was studied.
- Never create or hand-edit
references_cache/*.md. Generate or regenerate a cache entry withjust fetch-reference <ID>. - Never use fuzzy auto-repair to rewrite snippets. Read the source and copy the exact passage, choose another source, or remove the evidence.
- Treat deep-research output as leads, not ground truth.
Evidence shape
evidence:
- reference: PMID:12345678
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Exact text copied from the cited source."
explanation: "How this passage supports the specific KB claim."
Use supports: SUPPORT, REFUTE, or the value allowed by the schema. Make the
explanation connect the quote to the claim without adding conclusions the
quote does not establish.
Classify evidence_source by the cited study, not by the curator or the claim:
HUMAN_CLINICAL: patients, cohorts, clinical observations, or trialsMODEL_ORGANISM: in vivo non-human animal or organism workIN_VITRO: cells, organoids, explants, or biochemical assaysCOMPUTATIONAL: modeling, simulation, or in-silico analysisOTHER: evidence that does not fit the categories above
Inspect the schema and nearby current entries if a field or enum is uncertain.
Workflow
1. Screen deep-research sources
If evidence came from research/, first read the report's
reference_validation, unresolved_references, needs_review, and
off_topic_references results. Do not curate an unresolved identifier. An
off-topic flag is a reason to inspect the paper, not an automatic rejection.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · +34 lines c6b3bafe3a79
- 5d ago Changed · +127 lines b5732953ca6a
- 16d ago Changed · +7 lines 7c854fb2cec8
- 19d ago Changed · -1 lines 0a3c52899497
- 28d ago Changed · +9 lines d30fbbb9804f
- 29d ago Changed · +4 lines 33c588913477
- 1mo ago Changed · +96 lines 19a20fff565b
- 1mo ago Changed · +54 lines cf2fd643c75f
- 1mo ago Changed · +65 lines 186d05ef6de1
- 1mo ago First seen · 312 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 18733b67f005
dismech-references is a skill published in the GitHub repository monarch-initiative/dismech (69 stars, last pushed today), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 8,421 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
dosdp-design-patterns
Skills for understanding and applying DOSDP (Dead Simple Ontology Design Patterns) to ensure consistent ontology term creation and maintenance. This skill is about recognizing patterns and ensuring consistency, not using dosdp-tools directly.
robot-obo-tool
Skills for using ROBOT, the OBO ontology command-line toolkit for reasoning, template-based term creation, quality control, format conversion, and ontology manipulation. Use this when working with OWL/OBO ontologies that need automated processing.
editing-obo-ontologies
Skills and tools for editing OBO format ontologies, including querying terms, checking out/checking in individual terms, and following OBO format conventions. Do not use this if the source for the ontology you are editing is not in obo format (e.g. ofn).
ontology-access-kit
Skills for querying ontologies using the Ontology Access Kit (OAK). This should only be used for complex ontology operations, for basic external ontology searching use the OLS MCP.
cuopt-numerical-optimization-formulation
LP, MILP, QP — concepts, problem-text parsing, and formulation patterns (parameters, constraints, decisions, objective). Concepts only; no API.
complexa-sweep
Agent runbook for Proteina-Complexa parameter sweeps through the separately installed first-party CLI and config generator. Use for cartesian-product hyperparameter scans, sweeper YAML authoring, configuration comparisons, ablations, tuning, success-rate ranking, or Pareto searches over quality and wall-clock cost. Do…