test-driven-development

A test-first development method, often called TDD, where you write a test, confirm it fails, then write the smallest code that makes it pass.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when adding or changing production code. It guides the cycle of writing a failing test, implementing enough code to pass, and then improving the code.
Why use it?
It helps confirm that tests check real behavior instead of passing without detecting problems. It also gives feature work, bug fixes, refactoring, and behavior changes a repeatable workflow.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp/test-driven-development
Any agent
npx skills add movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp --skill test-driven-development
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 42 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,605 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 89% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00042 $0.02605
Opus 5 $0.00021 $0.01303
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00521
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00261

Measured 2d ago against content hash 26c5f812d885, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

89% identical to test-driven-development — 25 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

assets/skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md · 381 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 381 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Test-Driven Development (TDD)

Overview

Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.

Core principle: If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.

Violating the letter of the rules is violating the spirit of the rules.

When to Use

Always:

  • New features
  • Bug fixes
  • Refactoring
  • Behavior changes

Exceptions (ask your human partner):

  • Throwaway prototypes
  • Generated code
  • Configuration files

Thinking "skip TDD just this once"? Stop. That's rationalization.

The Iron Law

NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST

Write code before the test? Delete it. Start over.

No exceptions:

  • Don't keep it as "reference"
  • Don't "adapt" it while writing tests
  • Don't look at it
  • Delete means delete

Implement fresh from tests. Period.

Red-Green-Refactor

digraph tdd_cycle {
    rankdir=LR;
    red [label="RED\nWrite failing test", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ffcccc"];
    verify_red [label="Verify fails\ncorrectly", shape=diamond];
    green [label="GREEN\nMinimal code", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ccffcc"];
    verify_green [label="Verify passes\nAll green", shape=diamond];
    refactor [label="REFACTOR\nClean up", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ccccff"];
    next [label="Next", shape=ellipse];

    red -> verify_red;
    verify_red -> green [label="yes"];
    verify_red -> red [label="wrong\nfailure"];
    green -> verify_green;
    verify_green -> refactor [label="yes"];
    verify_green -> green [label="no"];
    refactor -> verify_green [label="stay\ngreen"];
    verify_green -> next;
    next -> red;
}

RED - Write Failing Test

Write one minimal test showing what should happen.

const result = await retryOperation(operation);

expect(result).toBe('success'); expect(attempts).toBe(3); });

Clear name, tests real behavior, one thing
</Good>

Read the full file on GitHub · 381 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 381 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 26c5f812d885

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 2,605 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to test-driven-development, differing in 25 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

agent-integration

Run all three agent integration phases sequentially: research, write-tests, and implement using E2E-first TDD (unit tests written last). For individual phases, use /agent-integration:research, /agent-integration:write-tests, or /agent-integration:implement. Use when the user says "integrate agent", "add agent…

entireio/cli · 89 tokens

engram-testing-coverage

TDD and coverage standards for Engram. Trigger: When implementing behavior changes in any package.

Gentleman-Programming/engram · 25 tokens

code-assist

Guides implementation of code tasks using test-driven development in an Explore, Plan, Code, Commit workflow. Acts as a Technical Implementation Partner and TDD Coach — following existing patterns, avoiding over-engineering, and producing idiomatic, modern code.

mikeyobrien/ralph-orchestrator · 53 tokens

tdd

Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.

GreyDGL/PentestGPT · 33 tokens

css-design-tdd

Test-driven CSS design system modifications. Run checks before/after CSS changes to verify token usage, variable definitions, fallbacks, and consistency. Use when modifying CSS tokens, fixing design inconsistencies, or auditing CSS architecture.

xiaolai/vmark · 49 tokens

mobiai-mobile-tdd

You MUST use this before writing any implementation code for a mobile feature, bug fix, refactor, or behavior change. Tests come before implementation — no exceptions.

ArisGuimera/MobiAI-Core · 38 tokens