Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mpaarating/ai-workflow-kit --skill standupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mpaarating/ai-workflow-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mpaarating/ai-workflow-kit/standup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mpaarating/ai-workflow-kit/standup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mpaarating/ai-workflow-kit/standup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mpaarating/ai-workflow-kit/standup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mpaarating/ai-workflow-kit/standup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00945 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00378 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00189 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
standup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Async Standup
Trigger Phrases
- "standup"
- "post update"
- "async update"
- "progress update"
- "team update"
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Work Context
Query {{tasks}} for the user's in-progress and recently completed items.
- In Progress: Tasks with "In Progress" or equivalent status, assigned to the user.
- Recently Completed: Tasks completed since the last standup (or in the last 2 days if no prior standup is found).
- Include: task ID, title, status.
If {{tasks}} is not configured, check today's daily page in {{notes}} for context instead. If neither is available, ask the user what they're working on.
Step 2: Collect Updates Per Item
For each in-progress item, ask the user:
- Progress: What did you do on this? (one line)
- Next: What's the next step? (one line)
- Blocked?: Anything blocking progress? (yes/no, and on whom if yes)
For recently completed items, just note them as done.
Quick mode: If the user provides all context inline (e.g., "standup: finished auth migration, working on PR review, blocked on deploy access"), parse it directly and skip the interactive questions.
Step 3: Format the Update
Draft the standup message using this structure:
**Done:**
- [task title] ([task ID])
- [task title] ([task ID])
**In Progress:**
- [task title] ([task ID]) — [progress note]. Next: [next step].
**Blocked:**
- [task title] ([task ID]) — blocked on [who/what]
[optional: one-line note about priorities or availability]
Rules:
- Keep each bullet to one line.
- Always include task IDs when available — they make updates searchable.
- If nothing is blocked, omit the Blocked section entirely.
- If the user mentions availability changes (OOO, half-day, meetings), add a brief note at the end.
Step 4: Preview and Confirm
Show the formatted message to the user and ask for confirmation before posting.
- Let them edit, add, or remove items.
- Don't post until they say it's good.
Step 5: Post to Team Channel
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 133 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 9eafc7ab637f
standup is a skill published in the GitHub repository mpaarating/ai-workflow-kit (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 945 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Checks whether a story is ready to implement: clear acceptance criteria, no open questions, valid ADR and dependencies. Use when the user asks if a story, or the sprint's stories, are ready to start or build.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
qa-project-bootstrap
Onboard a new QA engineer to an existing codebase, or audit an existing test architecture. Produces a 30-day ramp plan: codebase orientation, framework walkthrough, test architecture audit, mentorship pairing, and first-test guidance. Use when: "QA onboarding," "new tester," "ramp up," "test architecture audit,"…
remove
Remove a deployed framework or addon from the current workspace.