Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy --skill tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00368 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00184 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Ported from oh-my-codex
tdd. OMX runtime conventions ($macroinvocation,omxCLI,.omx/state directory) are replaced with WorkBuddy idioms (Skill tool, Agent tool, task list,.workbuddy/memory).
TDD — deprecated
Hard-deprecated as a standalone skill. Do not invoke or route this skill.
Keep test-first discipline inside the active implementation workflow (the plan skill and normal implementation flow). The discipline is the value; here it is for reference:
The Iron Law: NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST. Write code before the test? Delete it and start over.
Red-Green-Refactor cycle:
- RED — Write the next failing test; run it; it MUST fail. If it passes, the test is wrong.
- GREEN — Write only enough code to pass. No extras. Run; it MUST pass.
- REFACTOR — Improve quality; run tests after every change; must stay green.
- REPEAT — Next failing test.
Enforcement: code-before-test → stop and write the test; test-passes-first → fix it to fail; multiple features per cycle → one test, one feature; skipping refactor → go back and clean up.
For durable multi-goal execution that should keep this discipline, use ultragoal; for the implementation workflow itself, use plan.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 29 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 8821d9c7b58a
tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 368 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code.
test-driven-development
Drives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.
writing-skills
A guide for creating and testing reusable instructions for AI agents, called skills. It applies test-driven development, or TDD—the practice of writing tests before implementation—to instruction documents.
test-driven-development
Test-driven development, or TDD, is a way to build software by writing a test that fails, adding the smallest code that makes it pass, and then cleaning up the code. These instructions require that process for features, bug fixes, refactors, and behavior changes.
skillshare-implement-feature
Implement a feature from a spec file or description using TDD workflow. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: add a new CLI command, implement a feature from a spec, build new functionality, add a flag, create a new internal package, or write Go code for skillshare. This skill enforces test-first development…
skill-authoring
Guide creating Claude Code skills with TDD and persuasion principles. Use for new skill development.