Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to n8n-io/n8n. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/n8n-io/n8n/master/.agents/skills/human-like-code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/n8n-io/n8nWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/n8n-io/n8n/human-like-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/n8n-io/n8n/human-like-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/n8n-io/n8n/human-like-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/n8n-io/n8n/human-like-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/n8n-io/n8n/human-like-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.03235 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.01294 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00647 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00324 |
Grade A, and why
n8n:human-like-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 276 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 5fc81a6516b9
n8n:human-like-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository n8n-io/n8n (208,412 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 3,235 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
extending-hobby-smoke-tests
Design, extend, review, or debug PostHog Hobby end-to-end smoke tests in bin/hobby-ci.py and .github/workflows/ci-hobby.yml. Use when adding an ingestion round trip, deciding whether a product belongs in Hobby CI, changing the CI Hobby service topology or API-key scopes, or diagnosing a smoke test that captures data…
agent-upkeep
Perform one small, scoped maintenance improvement to the Elements monorepo and open a single reviewable pull request. Use this skill for scheduled or unattended upkeep runs that improve unit test coverage for one file, fix one behavioral bug in one module, or move one off ESLint rule toward enforcement to reduce…
pr-review
Review Cool Workflow pull requests or branch diffs. Use when Codex must inspect code changes for bugs, regressions, FreeBSD/POLA violations, missing tests, generated artifact drift, release-contract risk, or CI implications, and return findings first with file/line citations.
software-development-workflows
Use when planning, debugging, testing, reviewing, simplifying, or spiking code changes across languages: systematic debugging, TDD, debugpy/Node inspectors, code cleanup, and implementation strategy.
code-review
Perform a structured code review of changes, checking for correctness, style, tests, and potential issues.