Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add naodeng/awesome-qa-skills --skill mock-quality-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/naodeng/awesome-qa-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills/mock-quality-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills/mock-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills/mock-quality-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills/mock-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills/mock-quality-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00874 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00350 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
mock-quality-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 343 B
- evals/cases/basic-success.yaml 870 B
- evals/cases/domain-method-control.yaml 1.3 KB
- evals/cases/domain-method-success.yaml 1.2 KB
- evals/cases/edge-incomplete-input.yaml 631 B
- evals/cases/edge-scope-boundary.yaml 703 B
- evals/eval.yaml 531 B
- evals/local-rules.json 138 B
- evals/trigger-prompts.csv 575 B
- prompts/mock-quality-review.md 4.4 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +6 lines 36df4997c677
- 1mo ago First seen · 60 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A ef1f123c59c4
mock-quality-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository naodeng/awesome-qa-skills (265 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 874 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
Browser Agent QA Testing
Teach agents to use AI browser agents for exploratory and smoke QA with step budgets, evidence-based assertions, guardrails, and Playwright conversion.
cypress-cloud-cli
Runs the cy-cloud CLI to inspect Cypress Cloud organizations, projects, runs, specs, tests, failure screenshots, and Test Replay data. Use when the user mentions Cypress Cloud, cy-cloud, cypress-cloud-cli, a Cloud run or test URL, failing or flaky Cypress tests, Test Replay, run triage, Cloud artifacts, or asks why a…
visual-proof
Capture before/after screenshot evidence of a web page at real breakpoints (375, 768, 1440) in both light and dark themes, using Playwright against a local dev server or a deployed URL. Use before starting any visual change to capture the current state, and again after to prove the delta. Also use when asked to "show…
sorify-update
Update an existing Sorify test case with new Playwright code while preserving its code-version history.
neutron-log
Measure whether a token-saving tool actually saves tokens and keeps answers correct. Use before adopting or recommending RTK, headroom, caveman or any compressor, after changing a hook or instruction file, and when someone quotes a savings percentage. Runs a same-task before and after protocol and records only…
verification-loop
After a feature or refactor on this Windows estate, run six checks in order and write a PASS or FAIL note before a draft pull request. Use when work is about to be committed, pushed, or handed to another harness.