Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add naodeng/awesome-qa-skills --skill requirement-quality-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/naodeng/awesome-qa-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills/requirement-quality-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills/requirement-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills/requirement-quality-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills/requirement-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills/requirement-quality-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00979 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00392 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00196 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
requirement-quality-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 405 B
- evals/cases/basic-success.yaml 1018 B
- evals/cases/edge-incomplete-input.yaml 821 B
- evals/cases/edge-scope-boundary.yaml 1.0 KB
- evals/cases/review-complete-requirement-control.yaml 1.8 KB
- evals/cases/review-located-high-risk-gap.yaml 1.5 KB
- evals/eval.yaml 552 B
- evals/local-rules.json 137 B
- evals/trigger-prompts.csv 698 B
- prompts/requirement-quality-review.md 5.5 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 71 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 5148e0be7ba0
requirement-quality-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository naodeng/awesome-qa-skills (264 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 979 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-15.
Other skills, from other repositories
ask-first
A decision guide for handling unclear requests before taking action. It uses one focused question or probe when the requested goal, context, or boundaries are not clear.
insight-miner
A manually triggered writing guide that turns notes, debugging records, design summaries, code snippets, or rough drafts into Chinese technical blog posts. It first identifies and evaluates possible article topics before writing.
book-recommender
A Chinese-language book recommendation and analysis skill that evaluates what books are about, whether they are worth reading, and how to read them.
notes-to-blog
A manually triggered guide for turning technical notes and rough material into a Chinese programming blog post. It first extracts and evaluates the main transferable idea, then writes the article after the user confirms its direction.
wisdom-decoder
A guided explanation skill for ideas from Buddhism, philosophy, and psychology. It presents a chosen topic in everyday language and connects it to practical actions, sources, and perspectives from other fields.
blog-refine
A Chinese-language editing skill for improving technical blog drafts, including their structure, technical accuracy, logic, wording, and code examples.