Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to NikitaDmitrieff/auto-co-meta. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NikitaDmitrieff/auto-co-meta/main/.claude/skills/product-strategist/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NikitaDmitrieff/auto-co-metaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nikitadmitrieff/auto-co-meta/product-strategist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nikitadmitrieff/auto-co-meta/product-strategist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nikitadmitrieff/auto-co-meta/product-strategist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nikitadmitrieff/auto-co-meta/product-strategist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nikitadmitrieff/auto-co-meta/product-strategist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.02579 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01290 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00516 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00258 |
Grade A, and why
product-strategist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 380 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Product Strategist
Expert-level product strategy for market success.
Core Competencies
- Market analysis
- Competitive positioning
- Go-to-market strategy
- Product-led growth
- Business modeling
- Strategic planning
- Portfolio management
- Partnership strategy
Market Analysis
Market Sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM)
TAM (Total Addressable Market)
├── Total market demand if 100% market share
├── Calculation: # of potential customers × average revenue per customer
└── Example: 10M businesses × $1000/year = $10B
SAM (Serviceable Addressable Market)
├── Portion of TAM we can serve with our product
├── Filter by geography, segment, use case
└── Example: 2M businesses in our target segment = $2B
SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market)
├── Realistic market share in 3-5 years
├── Based on competition, resources, go-to-market
└── Example: 5% of SAM = $100M
Market Analysis Framework
# Market Analysis: [Market Name]
## Market Size
- TAM: $[X]B ([growth rate]% CAGR)
- SAM: $[X]B
- SOM: $[X]M
## Market Dynamics
### Growth Drivers
1. [Driver 1] - [Impact]
2. [Driver 2] - [Impact]
### Market Barriers
1. [Barrier 1] - [Mitigation]
2. [Barrier 2] - [Mitigation]
### Trends
- [Trend 1]: [Description]
- [Trend 2]: [Description]
## Customer Segments
| Segment | Size | Growth | Need | Willingness to Pay |
|---------|------|--------|------|-------------------|
| [Seg A] | [%] | [%] | [Need] | [$] |
| [Seg B] | [%] | [%] | [Need] | [$] |
## Competitive Landscape
[See competitive analysis section]
## Key Success Factors
1. [Factor 1]
2. [Factor 2]
3. [Factor 3]
Competitive Analysis
Competitive Matrix
| Factor | Us | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $X | $Y | $Z |
| Feature 1 | ★★★ | ★★ | ★★★★ |
| Feature 2 | ★★★★ | ★★★ | ★★ |
| UX | ★★★★ | ★★ | ★★★ |
| Support | ★★★ | ★★★★ | ★★ |
| Integration | ★★★★ | ★★★ | ★★★★ |
Porter's Five Forces
THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS: [Low/Med/High]
- Barriers to entry: [Assessment]
- Capital requirements: [Assessment]
- Brand loyalty: [Assessment]
BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS: [Low/Med/High]
- Supplier concentration: [Assessment]
- Switching costs: [Assessment]
BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS: [Low/Med/High]
- Buyer concentration: [Assessment]
- Price sensitivity: [Assessment]
THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES: [Low/Med/High]
- Availability: [Assessment]
- Switching costs: [Assessment]
COMPETITIVE RIVALRY: [Low/Med/High]
- Number of competitors: [Assessment]
- Industry growth: [Assessment]
- Differentiation: [Assessment]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 380 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 40755753acdb
product-strategist is a skill published in the GitHub repository NikitaDmitrieff/auto-co-meta (43 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 2,579 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
browser-automation
Playwright-based browser automation patterns for autonomous web interaction.
design-go-to-market-strategy
Use when launching a new product, entering a new market, or planning the commercialization approach for a startup or new business unit.
content-review
Scores content pieces and experiment specs before publication or launch. Part A: content scoring (8 dimensions, 0.0–1.0 each). Part B: experiment spec scoring (8 dimensions). Calibrated examples anchor scores across sessions. Verdict: APPROVE / REVISE / REJECT.
positioning
Builds a complete positioning artifact: named competitive alternative, 3-5 specific unique value attributes with proof points, and a structured positioning statement. Full chain: requires ICP card upstream; outputs to positioning-review before achieving FINAL status. Use when launching a new product or market, when…
pricing
Sets price as a decision derived from value, not from cost: chooses the value metric you charge by, triangulates the price against value, cost floor, and the competitive alternative, designs the packaging/tiers, and gates the result on unit-economics sanity (LTV/CAC, CAC payback) and a buy-readiness check. Carries a…
cold-start-motion
Designs the zero-to-one distribution motion: how a founder gets the first 100 users when there is no audience, no budget, and no repeatable channel yet. Names the minimum viable audience, picks the unscalable founder-led move to do first, then runs a cheap parallel channel test to find the one channel that compounds …