Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection --skill llm-integrationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collectionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/llm-integration)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/llm-integration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/llm-integration/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/llm-integration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/llm-integration.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 48 Skill allows unbounded resource consumption (API calls, storage, compute). Without rate limits or quotas, a compromised or misbehaving agent can cause denial-of-service or cost overruns.Fix: Set explicit rate limits, timeouts, and resource quotas for API calls, file operations, and compute. Implement circuit breakers for runaway loops.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01341 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00671 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00268 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
llm-integration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LLM Integration
Purpose
Integrate a language model into a production application, where the API is slow, rate-limited, occasionally down, and billed per token — none of which the quickstart mentions.
When to Use
- Adding an LLM to a production application.
- An LLM feature that is slow, expensive, or unreliable.
- Handling rate limits, streaming, or provider failover.
- Deciding where the model call belongs in the architecture.
Capabilities
- Streaming responses and partial rendering.
- Retry, backoff, and rate-limit handling.
- Timeouts and cancellation.
- Prompt caching and response caching.
- Multi-provider fallback.
- Token accounting and cost control.
Inputs
- The feature, its latency budget, and its cost budget.
- The provider's rate limits and their actual behavior under load.
- Whether the output is user-facing (stream it) or machine-consumed (do not).
Outputs
- A client with retries, timeouts, and a circuit breaker.
- Streaming where a user is waiting.
- Cost and latency instrumented per call.
Workflow
- Stream anything a human waits for — A 12-second response that starts rendering at 400ms feels fast. The same response delivered at once feels broken. Streaming is a perceived-latency fix, not a throughput one.
- Handle rate limits properly — Honor
Retry-After. Exponential backoff with jitter. A retry storm against a rate-limited endpoint extends the outage. - Set a timeout — LLM calls can hang. An unbounded call holds a connection and a worker until something else breaks.
- Cache the stable prefix — Prompt caching makes a large system prompt nearly free after the first call. This is often the largest single cost reduction available.
- Fail over deliberately — A second provider or a smaller model as a fallback. Decide in advance whether a degraded answer is better than no answer for this feature.
- Instrument tokens and cost per call — Attributed to the feature and the tenant. Without this, an LLM bill is an unexplainable number.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 145 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 07ef219d31b4
llm-integration is a skill published in the GitHub repository nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection (26 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,341 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
302ai-api-integration
ALWAYS use this skill when user needs ANY API functionality (AI models, image generation, video, audio, text processing, etc.). Automatically search 302.AI's 1400+ APIs and generate integration code. Use proactively whenever APIs or AI capabilities are mentioned.
gemini-interactions-api
Guides the usage of Gemini Interactions API on Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform. Use when the user wants to use the stateful, server-managed Interactions API for multi-turn conversations, background execution, streaming, structured output, and function calling on the Agent Platform.
notebooklm
Install, authenticate, troubleshoot, and operate Gemini Notebook through the notebooklm-py CLI or typed async Python API. Use for notebook and source management, grounded chat and research, and artifact generation or download when the user mentions Gemini Notebook, notebooklm-py, the notebooklm CLI, or its Python API.…
gemini-live-api
Generates a Gemini LiveAPI client service class in the user's chosen programming language. Use when the user wants to build, scaffold, or integrate a client that connects to the Gemini Enterprise LiveAPI websocket endpoint, handles session setup/resumption, bearer token refresh, and sending/receiving…
gemini-api-dev
Use this skill when writing code that calls the Gemini API for text generation, multi-turn chat, multimodal understanding, image generation, video generation, streaming responses, background research tasks, function calling, structured output, or migrating from the old generateContent API. Covers SDK usage and best…
offensive-api-abuse
Advanced API exploitation methodology focused on business logic abuse and sophisticated attack patterns that bypass traditional security controls. Covers business logic bypass through API call chaining and workflow manipulation. Addresses GraphQL-specific attacks including batching for credential brute-force, query…