Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/nvlabs/aspire/yam-runtime-artifactsnpx skills add NVlabs/ASPIRE --skill yam-runtime-artifactsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NVlabs/ASPIREWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvlabs/aspire/yam-runtime-artifacts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvlabs/aspire/yam-runtime-artifacts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nvlabs/aspire/yam-runtime-artifacts.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01794 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00897 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00359 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
yam-runtime-artifacts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
YAM Runtime Artifacts
Run artifact commands from the Aspire real-robot workspace (aspire/real).
All logs/** paths below are relative to that directory.
Runs write to logs/<script_name>_<YYYYMMDDTHHMMSS>/.
Artifact inspection rule: tool return is not success. For physical debugging, the two highest-value evidence sources are:
debug_events.jsonl: what the robot was commanded to do, in order, with timestamps, arguments, durations, and errors.- Video frames from
top.mp4,left.mp4,right.mp4, andbottom.mp4: what physically happened before, during, and after those commands.
Do not infer contact, grasp, drawer motion, collision, or success from JSON
alone. Align command windows from debug_events.jsonl with extracted video
frames. If videos are missing or corrupt, treat the run as weak evidence unless
the task is specifically recorder debugging.
Core workflow:
-
Validate recorder output:
python3 -m json.tool logs/<run>/preview_recording_result.jsonEach needed camera should have
ok=true,ffprobe.ok=true, nonzeroduration_s, nonzeronb_frames,backend="python",codec_name="h264", andpix_fmt="yuv420p". -
Read the robot-command chronology:
rg -n 'tool_start|tool_end|freespace_move|servo_ee_delta|set_gripper|get_robot_state' logs/<run>/debug_events.jsonlUse this to identify the exact windows for approach, close, contact, push, pull, release, retreat, and failures. Prefer actual tool arguments over script labels when deciding motion direction.
-
Extract frames around those windows:
mkdir -p /tmp/yam_frames for cam in top left right bottom; do for t in 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80; do ffmpeg -hide_banner -loglevel error -y -ss "$t" \ -i "logs/<run>/${cam}.mp4" -frames:v 1 \ "/tmp/yam_frames/${cam}_${t}.jpg" done doneThen inspect the relevant frames or make contact sheets. Always include frames before, during, and after the motion; a single final frame often hides whether contact was useful, transient, or accidental.
-
Answer the physical question from the paired evidence:
- Did the gripper actually reach the target, or only the planned pose?
- Did the fingers capture the object/handle, or slide along it?
- Did the object move relative to fixed scene features?
- Did the gripper open before retreat or while still engaged?
- Did the final state persist after release?
Supporting artifacts:
result.json: final reward/success packet fromrun_script.py. It may wrap script details underdetailsorinfo. Treat it as an index, not proof.stage_summary.md: human-readable summary written by scripts that callwrite_stage_summary. Useful for compact config, final state, andwhy_stopped, but still verify againstdebug_events.jsonland videos.task_result.json: some older scripts write their own result packet here. Compare withresult.jsonif both exist.exec.log: process-level stdout/stderr and Python exceptions. Use this for import errors, uncaught tracebacks, and recorder startup/shutdown messages.run_<script>_<timestamp>.txt: dashboard/tool-call transcript. It often includes sampled robot state before/after tool calls, in-flight tool status, and final concise state even whenresult.jsonis sparse.profiling.json: summarized tool timings and per-call results. Useful for confirming which motion-capable tools actually ran and whether tool errors occurred.episode_config.json: resolved run configuration such as env, robot mode, recording/debug UI settings, and script file.code.pyandcode_snapshot.json: copy of the executed script/source provenance. Use this to match artifacts to the code version that actually ran.
Video and recorder artifacts:
top.mp4,left.mp4,right.mp4,bottom.mp4: BundleSDF preview videos. Primary physical evidence for contact, scene reset, object motion, grasp failure, and collision risk. Current runs should leave these root MP4s encoded as H.264 withyuv420ppixel format.<camera>.pre_h264.mp4: original OpenCV/Python preview-recorder output preserved before H.264 re-encode. Use it only for recorder debugging or to recover evidence if the root H.264 file is missing.<camera>.h264_reencode.log: ffmpeg stderr from the Python recorder's H.264 post-encode step. Empty is normal; nonempty output can explain codec or finalization failures.preview_recording_preflight.json: preview availability before the run. Use it to prove BundleSDF preview streams were reachable at launch.preview_recording_result.json: recorder result after the run. A video is usable only if the camera entry hasok=true,ffprobe.ok=true, nonzeroduration_s, nonzeronb_frames, a sane size,codec_name="h264", andpix_fmt="yuv420p". Preferbackend="python"for current real runs.<camera>.preview_probe.log: per-camera probe diagnostics.<camera>.preview_recorder.log: per-camera recorder diagnostics. If MP4s are 48 bytes, missing, or ffprobe reportsmoov atom not found, inspect this log and treat the run as lacking visual evidence.observations/: raw or serialized camera/RGB-D/robot observations captured by the script. Use this for exact images, depth, masks, and robot state at named stages.vis/observations/: rendered observation images, overlays, and contact sheets. Use these before guessing from raw arrays.- SAM3 or detector overlays: usually under
vis/,observations/, or detector-specific subdirectories. Check selected masks/bboxes against the actual target; false positives can make an otherwise valid plan irrelevant. - BundleSDF/object pose outputs: use these to compare perceived object pose, preview camera evidence, and any target pose used by the motion planner.
plans/: candidate poses, waypoint previews, planner packets, failed IK/RRT details, and selected trajectory summaries.- Planner preview images/videos: use these to check approach direction, clearance, tool orientation, and whether the gripper is aimed at the selected object or a false-positive mask.
- Function-call JSON: some scripts write attempted tool calls, parameters, and per-stage results. These are the bridge between perception/plans and robot motion.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 155 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A a375d4474c5d
yam-runtime-artifacts is a skill published in the GitHub repository NVlabs/ASPIRE (127 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,794 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
instrument-data-to-allotrope
Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…
exploratory-data-analysis
Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files. Use for redacted CSV/TSV/JSON profiles; optional NumPy, HDF5, FASTA/FASTQ, and basic image metadata inspection; missingness/leakage audits; outlier and transformation sensitivity; and rigorous EDA report scaffolds. Other domain…
matlab
Build, review, migrate, and safely plan MATLAB or GNU Octave numerical workflows, including arrays, tabular/time data, tests, projects, graphics, MAT files, and explicit Python interoperability.
phylogenetics
Build and analyze phylogenetic trees using MAFFT (multiple alignment), IQ-TREE 2 (maximum likelihood), and FastTree (fast NJ/ML). Visualize with ETE3 or FigTree. For evolutionary analysis, microbial genomics, viral phylodynamics, protein family analysis, and molecular clock studies.
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
mapping-to-snomed
Maps clinical concept spans extracted by OpenMed to SNOMED CT concepts through a USER-SUPPLIED terminology server (the user's own Ontoserver, Snowstorm, or UMLS/UTS), never a bundled vocabulary. Use when the user wants to code findings, disorders, procedures, body structures, or substances to SNOMED CT, run an ECL…