Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-test-refactoring-cataloggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nWave-ai/nWaveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nwave-ai/nwave/nw-test-refactoring-catalog)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nwave-ai/nwave/nw-test-refactoring-catalog"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nwave-ai/nwave/nw-test-refactoring-catalog/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nwave-ai/nwave/nw-test-refactoring-catalog"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nwave-ai/nwave/nw-test-refactoring-catalog.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00796 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00318 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00159 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
nw-test-refactoring-catalog scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Refactoring Catalog
Test Code Smells (Full Detail)
L1 Readability Smells
Obscure Test
- Problem: test name does not reveal business scenario being tested
- Detection: generic names like Test1(), ProcessOrderTest(), or names requiring reading test body to understand
- Solution: rename to Given_When_Then or should_do_expected_thing_when_condition format
Before: public void Test1() { /* ... */ }
After: public void ProcessOrder_PremiumCustomer_AppliesCorrectDiscount() { /* ... */ }
Hard-Coded Test Data
- Problem: magic numbers and strings obscure business rules being tested
- Detection: numbers like 1000, 0.15, strings without explanation
- Solution: extract to named constants that reveal business meaning
Before: Assert.Equal(850, result.Total); // What discount?
After: const decimal EXPECTED_TOTAL = 1000 * (1 - 0.15m);
Assert.Equal(EXPECTED_TOTAL, result.Total);
Assertion Roulette
- Problem: multiple assertions without messages make failures unclear
- Detection: multiple Assert.* calls without message parameter
- Solution: add descriptive message to each assertion explaining expected business outcome
L2 Complexity Smells
Eager Test
- Problem: single test verifies multiple unrelated behaviors
- Detection: multiple arrange/act/assert cycles or assertions testing different concerns
- Solution: split into focused tests, one per business scenario
Before: ProcessOrderTest() { /* tests discount AND shipping AND tax */ }
After: ProcessOrder_AppliesDiscount()
ProcessOrder_CalculatesShipping()
ProcessOrder_CalculatesTax()
Prefer parameterized tests for variations of the same behavior.
Test Code Duplication
- Problem: repeated test setup logic across multiple tests
- Detection: same object creation, mock setup, or data builders copied in 3+ tests
- Solution: extract helper methods
Extract: CreatePremiumCustomer(), CreateHighValueOrder()
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A af11cad1d79d
nw-test-refactoring-catalog is a skill published in the GitHub repository nWave-ai/nWave (620 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 796 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
java-testing-junit-mockito
Use when writing tests for Java (Quarkus or Spring) code - JUnit Jupiter structure, Mockito for collaborators, test slices, Testcontainers, and framework-native integration tests, test-first.
test-writing
Writes meaningful tests that actually catch bugs.
rust-testing
Rust testing patterns including unit tests, integration tests, async testing, property-based testing, mocking, and coverage. Follows TDD methodology.
temporal-python-testing
Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking strategies. Covers unit testing, integration testing, replay testing, and local development setup. Use when implementing Temporal workflow tests or debugging test failures.
nemo-automodel-recipe-development
Create and modify NeMo AutoModel training and evaluation recipes, including YAML structure, builders, and execution flow.