Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add obsfx/trekker --skill issue-trackinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/obsfx/trekkerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/obsfx/trekker/issue-tracking)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/obsfx/trekker/issue-tracking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/obsfx/trekker/issue-tracking/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/obsfx/trekker/issue-tracking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/obsfx/trekker/issue-tracking.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00867 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00347 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
issue-tracking scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- issue-tracking — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Issue Tracking with Trekker
When the user discusses issues, bugs, tasks, or features they want to track, suggest using Trekker.
Learn More
Run trekker quickstart for full command reference and workflow guide.
Trigger Keywords
This skill applies when conversation includes:
issue,bug,defect,problemtask,ticket,work item,storyfeature,enhancement,improvementbacklog,tracking,track thistodo,to-do,action item
Behavior
1. Check Trekker Status
# Verify trekker is initialized
ls .trekker/trekker.db 2>/dev/null && echo "initialized" || echo "not initialized"
If not initialized, suggest:
trekker init
2. Ask Permission (Required)
Before creating or modifying any issue, always ask:
"Would you like me to track this in Trekker? I can create a task with:
- Title: [inferred title]
- Priority: [suggested priority]
- Description: [brief summary]"
Wait for explicit approval before proceeding.
3. Search Before Creating
Before creating a new issue, search for duplicates using single keywords (FTS5, not semantic):
# Use the most distinctive keyword from the issue
trekker search "<keyword>" --type task,subtask --limit 5
# Try a second keyword if first search has no results
trekker search "<related keyword>" --type task,subtask --limit 5
If similar issues exist, present them to the user:
"Found existing tasks that might be related: [list]. Should I link to these instead of creating new?"
4. Create or Update
If approved and no duplicates:
trekker task create -t "<title>" -d "<description>" -p <priority>
If updating existing:
trekker comment add <task-id> -a "claude" -c "<update>"
When to Suggest Trekker
DO suggest when user:
- Describes a bug or issue to fix
- Mentions a feature to implement
- Lists multiple things to do
- Asks to "remember" or "track" something
- Discusses work that spans multiple sessions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 120 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 3f81ed539af5
issue-tracking is a skill published in the GitHub repository obsfx/trekker (84 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 867 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-25.
Other skills, from other repositories
swarm-plan
Full execution protocol for MODE: PLAN -- plan creation, external plan ingestion, QA gate persistence, task granularity, and traceability checks.
loop
Full execution protocol for MODE: LOOP — the compound-engineering loop: brainstorm → plan → build → review → improve, iterating under defense-in-depth stop conditions with generator/critic separation, durable resumable state, and mandatory compounding learning capture. Loaded on demand by the architect when the loop…
parallel-work-check
Apply before starting work on an existing branch. Checks for parallel work by other agents or developers that may supersede or conflict with your planned changes. Prevents wasted effort on stale branches.
issue-ingest
Full execution protocol for MODE: ISSUEINGEST -- GitHub issue intake, localization, spec generation, and transition to the full fix workflow.
phase-wrap
Claude Code adapter for MODE: PHASE-WRAP. Delegates to the canonical opencode-swarm phase boundary protocol.
autogpt-agents
Autonomous AI agent platform for building and deploying continuous agents. Use when creating visual workflow agents, deploying persistent autonomous agents, or building complex multi-step AI automation systems.