Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm --skill issue-ingestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/issue-ingest)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/issue-ingest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/issue-ingest/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/issue-ingest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/issue-ingest.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.02768 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.01107 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00554 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00277 |
Grade A, and why
issue-ingest scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 129 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Issue Ingest Protocol
This protocol is loaded on demand by the architect runtime. The architect prompt keeps only activation, action, and hard safety constraints; the full execution details live here.
MODE: ISSUE_INGEST
Activates when: user invokes /swarm issue <url>; OR architect receives [MODE: ISSUE_INGEST issue="<url>"] signal.
Purpose: ingest a GitHub issue, localize root cause, and produce a resolution spec. The issue URL points to a GitHub issue that describes a bug, feature request, or task to be resolved.
Flags parsed from signal:
plan=true→ after spec generation, transition to MODE: PLAN (create implementation plan)trace=true→ the issue-trace runtime hook automatically drives the standard PLAN → CRITIC-GATE → EXECUTE → commit-pr ladder (implies plan=true)noRepro=true→ skip the reproduction step below
Phase 1: INTAKE
- Fetch the issue body using the GitHub CLI (
gh issue view <N> --repo <owner>/<repo> --json title,body,labels,assignees,comments) or web fetch.- If the issue cannot be fetched (404, private repo, no
ghauth, or the argument resolves to a PR not an issue), report the blocked operation explicitly and do not proceed on empty intake; fall back to any pasted issue text the user provided. Closed-issue cases proceed but note the closed state.
- If the issue cannot be fetched (404, private repo, no
- Read
.swarm/issue-reference.jsonas the authoritative source for the issue URL, owner, repo, number, and flags (plan/trace/noRepro). If absent, fall back to the URL from the mode signal string. - Parse the issue into a normalized Intake Note with four required fields:
- Observed behavior: what the issue reports
- Expected behavior: what should happen instead
- Reproduction steps: how to trigger the issue (may be absent; flag with
[NEEDS REPRO]if missing) - Environment: platform, version, configuration context
- If any required field is missing and cannot be inferred from context, flag as
[NEEDS REPRO]. - Attempt a minimal reproduction of the reported issue: record the exact commands and their output. Skip this step when
noRepro=true(set via--no-repro); in that case, note that reproduction was skipped and proceed on the issue text alone. Whentrace=true, the issue-trace engine requires reproduction evidence OR a typed--no-reprowaiver before it can leave localization and transition to PLAN: after attempting reproduction, callrecord_issue_reproductionwith the issue number,performed: true, and the recordedcommands/output_summaryso the gate is satisfied. Aperformed: falsereceipt is recorded but does NOT satisfy the gate. - Ask the user clarifying questions one at a time, max 6 per intake, when the issue text is ambiguous; otherwise flag the item with markers like
[NEEDS REPRO]or[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]and proceed. - Exit when the Intake Note is complete or all missing fields are flagged.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago Changed · +1 lines c0e4b79dbcc3
- 1mo ago Changed 6704924640d4
- 1mo ago Changed · +18 lines f0424479650b
- 1mo ago First seen · 110 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 629fcf929762
issue-ingest is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm (511 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 2,768 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-issue
Draft and submit a GitHub issue from a user idea or bug description, with bilingual body and correct labels.
requirements-writer
Use when converting PM intake into a slice SPEC.md with observable acceptance outcomes, explicit scope, and advisory sibling build dependencies.
backlog-capture
Quickly capture product ideas, feature requests, or insights from meetings and conversations. Rapid documentation with smart categorization and deduplication.
queue-handoff
Use when ending a turn, finishing a slice, blocked on another agent's work, or escalating to a human — durable work handoff via queue items so the system keeps moving across compactions, missed messages, and interruptions. Covers the hot-potato terminal-turn-rule (active work ends by passing the ball, not by going…
development-team
Use when a development pod begins or hands off implementation, QA, or design work.
client-onboarding
Use when a deal closed or a user signed up and the first 30 days need an activation plan: sales→delivery handoff, one verifiable activation event, kickoff, and a 30/60/90 or day-0→14 plan with owners, dates and a measurable exit. NOT reactive ticket triage (that is customer-support), NOT renewals/churn past the…