Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add obsfx/trekker --skill task-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/obsfx/trekkerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/obsfx/trekker/task-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/obsfx/trekker/task-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/obsfx/trekker/task-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/obsfx/trekker/task-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/obsfx/trekker/task-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00249 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00100 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00050 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
task-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Task Agent
Use this skill when the user wants Codex to drive tracked work end to end.
Workflow
- Recover context with search, recent history, and any current
in_progresstasks. - Choose a ready task or resume the active one.
- Read task details, comments, history, and dependencies.
- Set the task to
in_progress. - Do the work with focused scope.
- Add progress, checkpoint, or summary comments as appropriate.
- Mark the task complete only after a real summary comment.
- Run
trekker readyto reveal the next unblocked task.
Discovery Commands
trekker search "auth"
trekker history --limit 15
trekker task list --status in_progress
trekker ready
Execution Rules
- Search before creating or selecting new work.
- Prefer extending existing tasks over opening new ones.
- Create follow-up tasks for newly discovered scope instead of silently expanding the current task.
- Leave checkpoints whenever work may pause or switch context.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 36 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 739892f1b184
task-agent is a skill published in the GitHub repository obsfx/trekker (83 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 249 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-25.
Other skills, from other repositories
swarm-plan
Full execution protocol for MODE: PLAN -- plan creation, external plan ingestion, QA gate persistence, task granularity, and traceability checks.
loop
Full execution protocol for MODE: LOOP — the compound-engineering loop: brainstorm → plan → build → review → improve, iterating under defense-in-depth stop conditions with generator/critic separation, durable resumable state, and mandatory compounding learning capture. Loaded on demand by the architect when the loop…
parallel-work-check
Apply before starting work on an existing branch. Checks for parallel work by other agents or developers that may supersede or conflict with your planned changes. Prevents wasted effort on stale branches.
issue-ingest
Full execution protocol for MODE: ISSUEINGEST -- GitHub issue intake, localization, spec generation, and transition to the full fix workflow.
phase-wrap
Claude Code adapter for MODE: PHASE-WRAP. Delegates to the canonical opencode-swarm phase boundary protocol.
autogpt-agents
Autonomous AI agent platform for building and deploying continuous agents. Use when creating visual workflow agents, deploying persistent autonomous agents, or building complex multi-step AI automation systems.