Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add OneWave-AI/claude-skills --skill sow-generatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OneWave-AI/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/onewave-ai/claude-skills/sow-generator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/onewave-ai/claude-skills/sow-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/onewave-ai/claude-skills/sow-generator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/onewave-ai/claude-skills/sow-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/onewave-ai/claude-skills/sow-generator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00869 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00434 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
sow-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Statement of Work Generator
Generate complete, client-ready Statements of Work from a project brief, meeting the standards of Big Four consulting firms, top-tier agencies, and enterprise procurement. Produce polished documents ready for client review with minimal edits, never rough drafts or templates with blanks.
Contents
references/required-inputs.md-- inputs to gather and pre-generation client researchreferences/document-structure.md-- the 16-section SOW structure with templates for every sectionreferences/pricing-templates.md-- fixed-price, time-and-materials, and retainer pricing models (Section 11)references/legal-terms.md-- confidentiality, IP, warranties, liability, termination, and other legal clauses (Section 14)references/change-management.md-- change request and change order process (Section 12)references/risk-management.md-- risk register and escalation path (Section 13)
Workflow
- Gather the required inputs. Read
references/required-inputs.md. If any required item is missing, ask for it explicitly. Do not guess at critical commercial terms. - Research the client. Use WebSearch per
references/required-inputs.mdto gather company overview, recent news, technology footprint, and regulatory environment. If research yields nothing, proceed on user-provided inputs and flag assumptions explicitly. Never fabricate company information. - Select the pricing model from
references/pricing-templates.mdbased on engagement type (default: fixed-price). - Generate all 16 sections following
references/document-structure.md, pulling Section 11 from pricing-templates, Section 12 from change-management, Section 13 from risk-management, and Section 14 from legal-terms. Replace every bracketed placeholder with real values from inputs and research. Leave brackets only where the user explicitly deferred. Mark gaps with[ACTION REQUIRED: ...]. - Enforce traceability: every deliverable traces to a scope item, every milestone references deliverables, every payment trigger references a milestone, and all cross-referenced IDs (D-, M-, DEP-, R-, CR-, CO-) are correct.
- Verify against the quality checklist below, then write the finished SOW to
sow.mdin the working directory (or a user-specified path).
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 61 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A f0bae9dcb77a
sow-generator is a skill published in the GitHub repository OneWave-AI/claude-skills (291 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 869 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
vendor-evaluation
Evaluate, select, and contract with vendors and SaaS tools. Use this skill when comparing alternatives, running an RFP, scoring vendors against criteria, negotiating contracts, planning a switch, or assessing a vendor's risk. Triggers on vendor evaluation, RFP, vendor selection, build vs buy, SaaS evaluation, vendor…
massenschaden-datenmodell-rechtsabteilung
Für Massenschaden Datenmodell: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: massenschaden-datenmodell-rechtsabteilung.
resume-screener
Screen resumes efficiently against job requirements with structured scoring, red flag identification, and interview recommendations.
after-action-report
Run a structured after-action review (postmortem, retrospective) on a launch, incident, or completed project to capture timeline, root cause analysis, contributing factors, and actionable lessons. Use this skill whenever the user wants to run a postmortem, retrospective, AAR, or after-action review on any past event.…
stakeholder-communication
Communicate effectively with stakeholders across functions and seniority levels. Use this skill when writing status updates, preparing executive reviews, sharing technical decisions with non-technical audiences, managing up, communicating bad news, or designing the communication cadence for a project. Triggers on…
juristischer-argumentationskern
Schaltet sich ein, wenn in Agb Recht Prüfer ein juristisches Arbeitsprodukt tragfähig begründet werden muss; verbindet konkrete Aktenfundstellen mit Tatbestandsmerkmal, Beweislast, stärkster Gegenposition und Rechtsfolge.