Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Orinks/AccessiWeather. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Orinks/AccessiWeather/main/.codex/skills/ultraqa/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Orinks/AccessiWeatherWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/orinks/accessiweather/ultraqa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/orinks/accessiweather/ultraqa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/orinks/accessiweather/ultraqa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/orinks/accessiweather/ultraqa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/orinks/accessiweather/ultraqa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Memory Poisoning · line 131 Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.01323 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00529 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00265 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
ultraqa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
UltraQA Skill
[ULTRAQA ACTIVATED - AUTONOMOUS QA CYCLING]
Overview
GPT-5.5 Guidance Alignment
Use the shared workflow guidance pattern: outcome-first framing, concise visible updates for multi-step QA, local overrides for the active workflow branch, validation proportional to risk, explicit stop rules, and automatic continuation for safe reversible steps. Ask only for material, destructive, credentialed, external-production, or preference-dependent branches.
You are now in ULTRAQA mode - an autonomous QA cycling workflow that runs until your quality goal is met.
Cycle: qa-tester → architect verification → fix → repeat
Goal Parsing
Parse the goal from arguments. Supported formats:
| Invocation | Goal Type | What to Check |
|---|---|---|
/ultraqa --tests |
tests | All test suites pass |
/ultraqa --build |
build | Build succeeds with exit 0 |
/ultraqa --lint |
lint | No lint errors |
/ultraqa --typecheck |
typecheck | No TypeScript errors |
/ultraqa --custom "pattern" |
custom | Custom success pattern in output |
If no structured goal provided, interpret the argument as a custom goal.
Cycle Workflow
Cycle N (Max 5)
-
RUN QA: Execute verification based on goal type
--tests: Run the project's test command--build: Run the project's build command--lint: Run the project's lint command--typecheck: Run the project's type check command--custom: Run appropriate command and check for pattern--interactive: Use qa-tester for interactive CLI/service testing:delegate(role="qa-tester", tier="STANDARD", task="TEST: Goal: [describe what to verify] Service: [how to start] Test cases: [specific scenarios to verify]")
-
CHECK RESULT: Did the goal pass?
- YES → Exit with success message
- NO → Continue to step 3
-
ARCHITECT DIAGNOSIS: Spawn architect to analyze failure
delegate(role="architect", tier="THOROUGH", task="DIAGNOSE FAILURE: Goal: [goal type] Output: [test/build output] Provide root cause and specific fix recommendations.")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 144 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 3764e89c4662
ultraqa is a skill published in the GitHub repository Orinks/AccessiWeather (24 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,323 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.