data-analysis

data-analysis is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Orkas-AI/Orkas. It costs 2 tokens per session (1,365 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A method for examining data and producing conclusions that can be checked. It covers tasks such as profiling data, calculating results, and applying statistical methods only when their assumptions are supported.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to answer questions from supplied data, reconcile exact amounts, measure results, or support a decision with reviewable calculations.
Why use it?
It reduces the risk of reporting unsupported figures, misleading confidence scores, or invalid statistical results. It also helps preserve the original data unless a transformation is requested.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to answer questions from supplied data, reconcile exact amounts, measure results, or support a decision with reviewable calculations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/orkas-ai/orkas/08837be6032e
About the project

Orkas is a desktop application for commanding a team of AI agents through one chat, with a commander model assigning work to specialist agents in parallel or in sequence. People use it to coordinate research, writing, presentations, and software tasks while keeping files on their computer. The catalogue includes skills for extending the agents available to Orkas.

Orkas-AI/Orkas · 2,192 stars · on GitHub · orkas.ai

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Orkas-AI/Orkas --skill 08837be6032e
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Orkas-AI/Orkas

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for data-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/orkas-ai/orkas/08837be6032e/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/orkas-ai/orkas/08837be6032e)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/orkas-ai/orkas/08837be6032e"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/orkas-ai/orkas/08837be6032e/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for data-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/orkas-ai/orkas/08837be6032e"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/orkas-ai/orkas/08837be6032e.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 2 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,365 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00002 $0.01365
Opus 5.5 $0.00001 $0.00546
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00273
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00136

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 21298f89e81a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

data-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 8 executable files (scripts/adjust-pvalues.mjs, scripts/exact-total.mjs, scripts/input.mjs, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

resources/builtin/marketplace/skills/08837be6032e/SKILL.md · 111 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Data Analysis

Derive reviewable conclusions from the user's data. Use the available source and computation tools; this Skill does not prescribe a format, language, library, or artifact. Respect project metric definitions and business rules. Preserve inputs unless transformation was requested, and match effort to the decision's risk.

Apply three gates before analysis:

  • Precision gate: execute precision-preserving arithmetic before reporting an exact monetary/ledger reconciliation or another result where ordinary numeric arithmetic can lose meaningful digits. Reading values, profiling them, or writing out arithmetic is not verification.
  • Method gate: report no statistical interval, p-value, model coefficient, forecast, or probability unless an applicable method was executed and its assumptions are supported by the evidence. Calling a number rough or approximate does not supply a derivation.
  • Confidence gate: return no 0-100 or other numerical confidence unless the source defines the score or an applicable method estimates that quantity. Otherwise say it is not estimable from the supplied evidence. Never relabel an unsupported number as evidence strength, decision confidence, reliability, or confidence in the opposite conclusion. When the user requests numerical confidence, execute the bundled uncertainty-gate after classifying the claim and evidence; its rejection of a generic score is binding.

Evidence boundary

Every reported number needs a derivation, a unit, and a denominator where applicable. Apply this to the final recommendation, not just the calculations.

  • Units: retain source units unless a conversion is needed and supported. If the currency is unspecified, say so and keep the supplied monetary unit; do not guess a currency or silently scale the values. Label totals versus per-unit values and percentage points versus relative percentages.
  • Confidence: identify the requested quantity and whether the design/data can estimate it. A user's request for a number does not create evidence, and not estimable is not zero probability. A defined business scoring rule may be computed, but is not a probability.
  • Causality: a descriptive comparison, of any sign, establishes neither a causal effect nor its absence without a credible identifying design. Report the observed result separately from what remains unidentified.

Read the full file on GitHub · 111 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 111 lines · 2 tokens per session scan A 21298f89e81a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

data-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository Orkas-AI/Orkas (2,192 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 2 tokens to every session and 1,365 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.