Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add oyi77/1ai-skills --skill detecting-golden-ticket-forgerygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oyi77/1ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/detecting-golden-ticket-forgery)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/detecting-golden-ticket-forgery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/detecting-golden-ticket-forgery/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/detecting-golden-ticket-forgery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/detecting-golden-ticket-forgery.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high YARA Match · line 13 YARA rule matched a known malware signature (reverse shell, backdoor, ransomware, C2 framework, or info stealer).Fix: Remove the malware payload or compromised file entirely. Investigate how it entered the skill and audit all other artifacts for additional indicators of compromise.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.01073 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00536 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00215 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
detecting-golden-ticket-forgery scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Detecting Golden Ticket Forgery
Overview
A Golden Ticket attack (MITRE ATT&CK T1558.001) involves forging a Kerberos Ticket Granting Ticket (TGT) using the krbtgt account NTLM hash, granting unrestricted access to any service in the Active Directory domain. This skill detects Golden Ticket usage by analyzing Event ID 4769 for RC4 encryption type (0x17) in environments enforcing AES, identifying tickets with abnormal lifetimes exceeding domain policy, correlating TGS requests with missing corresponding TGT requests (Event ID 4768), and detecting krbtgt password age anomalies.
When to Use
Trigger phrases:
-
"detecting golden ticket forgery"
-
"Detect Kerberos Golden Ticket forgery by analyzing Windows Event ID 4769 for RC4"
-
When investigating security incidents that require detecting golden ticket forgery
-
When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
-
When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
-
When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
When NOT to Use
- When you lack proper authorization for testing
- For production systems without change management
- When the task requires legal or compliance expertise beyond technical scope
Prerequisites
- Windows Domain Controller with Kerberos audit logging enabled
- Splunk or Elastic SIEM ingesting Windows Security event logs
- Python 3.8+ for offline event log analysis
- Knowledge of domain Kerberos encryption policy (AES vs RC4)
Steps
# Example: IOC detection
import re
IOC_PATTERNS = {
"ip": r"\b(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\b",
"domain": r"\b[a-z0-9-]+\.[a-z]{2,}\b",
"hash_md5": r"\b[a-f0-9]{32}\b",
"hash_sha256": r"\b[a-f0-9]{64}\b",
}
def extract_iocs(text: str) -> dict:
return {k: re.findall(v, text) for k, v in IOC_PATTERNS.items()}
- Audit domain Kerberos encryption policy to establish AES-only baseline
- Forward Event IDs 4768 and 4769 to SIEM platform
- Detect RC4 (0x17) encryption in TGS requests where AES is enforced
- Identify TGS requests without corresponding TGT requests (forged ticket indicator)
- Alert on ticket lifetimes exceeding MaxTicketAge domain policy
- Monitor krbtgt account password age and last reset date
- Correlate findings with host/user context for risk scoring
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 122 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A e9e464055809
detecting-golden-ticket-forgery is a skill published in the GitHub repository oyi77/1ai-skills (12 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 1,073 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
active-directory-full-attack-chain
Execute a complete Active Directory penetration test from initial enumeration to domain dominance. Use this skill for AD security assessments including LDAP enumeration, Kerberos attacks (Kerberoasting, AS-REP roasting), BloodHound attack path analysis, credential dumping with Mimikatz, lateral movement via…
active-directory-golden-ticket
Forge highly privileged Kerberos Ticket Granting Tickets (TGTs) to gain persistent, undetectable, and long-term administrative access across an entire Active Directory domain. Use this skill during the final stages of a Red Team operation after Domain Admin access has been achieved, simulating an Advanced Persistent…
conducting-domain-persistence-with-dcsync
Perform DCSync attacks to replicate Active Directory credentials and establish domain persistence by extracting KRBTGT, Domain Admin, and service account hashes for Golden Ticket creation.
detecting-dcsync-attack-in-active-directory
Detect DCSync attacks where adversaries abuse Active Directory replication privileges to extract password hashes by monitoring for non-domain-controller accounts requesting directory replication via DsGetNCChanges.
active-directory-full-attack-chain
Execute a complete Active Directory penetration test from initial enumeration to domain dominance. Use this skill for AD security assessments including LDAP enumeration, Kerberos attacks (Kerberoasting, AS-REP roasting), BloodHound attack path analysis, credential dumping with Mimikatz, lateral movement via…
active-directory-golden-ticket
Forge highly privileged Kerberos Ticket Granting Tickets (TGTs) to gain persistent, undetectable, and long-term administrative access across an entire Active Directory domain. Use this skill during the final stages of a Red Team operation after Domain Admin access has been achieved, simulating an Advanced Persistent…