Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ozzy-labs/suasor --skill decisionsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ozzy-labs/suasorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ozzy-labs/suasor/decisions)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ozzy-labs/suasor/decisions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ozzy-labs/suasor/decisions/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ozzy-labs/suasor/decisions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ozzy-labs/suasor/decisions.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00107 | $0.01214 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00043 | $0.00486 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00243 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00121 |
Grade A, and why
decisions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
decisions
意思決定を引く単一入口（ADR-0046）。mode で「一覧・変遷」と「1 件の根拠」を切り替える。read-only。
以前は decision-log（一覧）と decision-rationale（根拠）に分かれていたが、どちらも decision.list + graph.related で、違いは何件を、どこまで深くだけだった。
いつ発火するか
| 言いかた | mode |
|---|---|
| 「今月の決定」「直近の意思決定一覧」「[topic] の決定履歴」「決定の変遷を追いたい」 | log（既定） |
| 「あの決定はなぜ」「X を選んだ理由」「なんで A じゃなくて B に」「この方針の根拠は?」 | rationale |
何をするか（MCP tool flow）
すべて read tool（ADR-0004）。
mode=log（既定）
decision.list（recordedAfter/recordedBefore、トピック絞りは結果側で）で対象期間の決定を引く- 各決定について
graph.relatedで背景 source を 1 hop 辿る（decision→source のderived_fromのみ。決定どうしを直接つなぐ辺は無い — 下記「先行決定の辿りかた」） - 時系列に並べ、変遷（何が何を置き換えたか）が分かる形でまとめる
mode=rationale
decision.listで対象の決定を特定する（曖昧なら候補を提示して選んでもらう）graph.relatedで provenance を辿る — その決定の根拠になった sourcesource.getで根拠 source の本文を読むsearchで当時の議論を補強する- 決定 + 経緯 + 根拠 source（+ 辿れた場合の先行決定）を組み立てて返す。却下された選択肢が記録されていればそれも示す
先行決定の辿りかた（辺が無いことを前提にする）
reducer が張る決定まわりの辺は decision → source の derived_from だけで、決定どうしを直接つなぐ辺は存在しない。したがって「先行決定」は次のどちらかでしか辿れない:
- 共有 source 経由の 2 hop — 決定の根拠 source から
graph.relatedを逆向きに辿り、同じ source を根拠に持つ別の決定を見る。同じ議論から複数の決定が出た場合にだけ当たる - 手で張った
manual_link—link.add（write / HITL）で決定間に明示的に張られていればgraph.relatedに出る
1 hop で何も返らないことを「先行決定は無い」と言い換えてはならない（ADR-0007 の "no silent wrong answer"）。辿れなかったときは「provenance link には記録が無い」と述べ、必要なら search で当時の議論を補う。
制約
- read-only。persist しない（決定の記録は
decision.record、HITL） - 根拠は provenance link に基づく。記録が無いものを推測で補わない（「記録が無い」と言う方が有用）
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 69 lines · 107 tokens per session scan A 1725d8ae9c46
decisions is a skill published in the GitHub repository ozzy-labs/suasor (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 107 tokens to every session and 1,214 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
exec-briefing-memo
A one-page decision memo that condenses complex material into the problem, recommended choice, evidence, trade-offs, risks, and next actions. It is meant for a decision maker, not as meeting notes, a weekly report, or a product requirements document.
decision-heuristics
A set of heuristics for making difficult personal decisions such as changing jobs, buying a home, moving, forming a partnership, or getting married. It is intended for major choices, not everyday decisions.
acceptance
A personal decision framework for difficult situations, built around three choices: change the situation, accept it, or leave it.
strategic-architect
A strategic planning guide for making long-term technology and business decisions. It uses systems thinking to consider goals, risks, resources, and lasting effects.
clarifier-une-decision
Décomposer une décision hésitante en contexte, critères, options et hypothèses, en validant à chaque étape, sans trancher à la place de la personne.
work-autonomous
Abbruchbedingung für autonome Loops: So weit wie möglich selbständig weiterarbeiten UND einen Loop erst beenden, wenn belegt ist, dass keine autonom ausführbare Aufgabe mehr vorliegt. Der bloße Eindruck "nichts mehr zu tun" reicht NICHT — er löst eine vierstufige Prüfkette aus (think/decide, CONTROL/DECISIONS…