agri-deep-research

agri-deep-research is a skill for Claude Code from PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition. It costs 154 tokens per session (888 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A deep-research workflow for writing a source-checked literature review about an agricultural question. It covers planning, searching, screening, evidence extraction, synthesis, criticism, editing, and ethics review.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps create agricultural literature reviews with a defined method, checked sources, verified claims, organised references, critical review, and final editing.
Why use it?
It reduces the risk of building a review on unsuitable, unverified, or weakly connected sources.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Part of the academic-skills-food-nutrition plugin — 41 skills shipped together

Good fit It helps create agricultural literature reviews with a defined method, checked sources, verified claims, organised references, critical review, and final editing.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/agri-deep-research
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition --skill agri-deep-research
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install academic-skills-food-nutrition, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 41 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for agri-deep-research

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/agri-deep-research/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/agri-deep-research)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/agri-deep-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/agri-deep-research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for agri-deep-research

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/agri-deep-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/agri-deep-research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 154 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 888 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00154 $0.00888
Opus 5 $0.00077 $0.00444
Sonnet 5 $0.00031 $0.00178
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00089

Measured 12d ago against content hash c7ff086497c9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

agri-deep-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agri-deep-research/SKILL.md · 56 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Agri-Deep-Research — Source-Validated Reviews for Agricultural Science

Run the food-deep-research skill exactly — its 12-subagent team (research_scope, research_architect, investigator, source_screener, source_verifier, bibliography, claim_verifier, synthesizer, critic, compiler, editor, ethics_reviewer), both loops (evidence loop and compile↔review loop), and its source discipline — with the agriculture substitutions in agri-research/references/agriculture-domain.md. Read that file first. No new machinery here.

The substitutions

  1. Persona — a senior agricultural scientist of the specific discipline; name it and apply its standards (domain §2). research_architect designs the method to that discipline's conventions.
  2. Evidence basesource_screener ranks agriculture + multidisciplinary literature: Tier 1 = Q1/Q2 of the seven agriculture categories (journals/_coverage_agriculture.md) + Nature/Science/Cell/PNAS + Q1/Q2 adjacent disciplines; Tier 2 = Q3 for gaps; Q4 avoided. FAO/USDA/CGIAR/EFSA and extension sources are evidence with a source and date (domain §3).
  3. Journal routingbibliography and compiler format via journal-selector using the agriculture coverage map (domain §4); APA 7.0 by default.

Source discipline (inherited, non-negotiable)

Investigation and claim-checking operate only on validated sources — those that passed source_screener (ranking) and source_verifier (existence, venue legitimacy, retraction, predatory check). Every claim carries a source and locator; inference is labelled as inference; [EVIDENCE GAP] rather than filling from memory.

Agricultural rigour

Apply domain §5 — the critic should attack the usual agricultural weak points: single site-year generalised to a recommendation, pseudoreplication (subsamples treated as replicates), pot-to-field extrapolation, missing G×E, and causal language unearned by the design.

Read the full file on GitHub · 56 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 56 lines · 154 tokens per session scan A c7ff086497c9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agri-deep-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition (31 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 154 tokens to every session and 888 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

paper-framework-figure-studio-pro

Human-in-the-loop research-paper framework figure workflow from S0-PAPER-FOUNDATION through terminal S5-CANDIDATE-IMAGE. Use for paper-grounded architecture, pipeline, method overview, agent workflow, system/data-flow, and mechanism figures with generated raster first-round/formal candidates, reviewer-first-glance…

tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills · 258 tokens

autofigure

Generate clean, EDITABLE vector figures (SVG + exact-size PDF) for research papers — method / architecture / pipeline / system-overview diagrams — with AutoFigure-Edit. Use whenever the user wants to create or vectorize a paper figure from a text description OR from a draft/screenshot/draw.io image: it generates a…

tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills · 0 tokens

paper-polish-pipeline

Staged, diagnosis-driven academic paper polishing pipeline (bilingual 中文/English). Use to revise a paper from rough draft to final submission across ordered stages: diagnose first, then optimize section by section, derive abstract/contributions from the revised body, polish the language to reduce AI-sounding phrasing…

tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills · 213 tokens

nature-paper2ppt

Build a complete but efficient Nature-style Chinese PPTX presentation from a scientific paper, preprint, PDF, article text, abstract, figure legends, or reading notes. Use this skill whenever the user asks to make slides/PPT/PPTX for journal club, group meeting, paper sharing, thesis seminar, lab meeting, department…

tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills · 146 tokens

nature-reviewer

A peer-review checklist that assesses a research paper from a referee’s point of view, including its novelty, importance, and technical soundness.

tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills · 96 tokens

nature-academic-search

Multi-source literature search, citation verification, MeSH search strategy, citation file management (.nbib/.ris/.bib conversion), and reference management (BibTeX, related articles, ID conversion) via MCP tools (PubMed, CrossRef, arXiv, Scopus, ScienceDirect). Use when the user needs coordinated multi-step…

tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills · 163 tokens