Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add panjose/Co-Scientist --skill co-scientist-pipelinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/panjose/Co-ScientistWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/panjose/co-scientist/co-scientist-pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/panjose/co-scientist/co-scientist-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/panjose/co-scientist/co-scientist-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/panjose/co-scientist/co-scientist-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/panjose/co-scientist/co-scientist-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.02816 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01408 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00563 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00282 |
Grade A, and why
co-scientist-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
co-scientist-pipeline
Goal:
- Run the full Co-Scientist pipeline for one research run.
Inputs:
- one run directory root
- run-local
input.md - optional compatibility
config.yaml - optional
resumeflag - existing run artifacts when resuming
Outputs:
- updated run artifacts
RUN_POLICY.yamlstate/POLICY_DECISION.jsonstate/RESOLVED_RUN_CONFIG.jsonstate/STRATEGY_PLAN.jsonstate/STRATEGY_DECISIONS.jsonlstate/EVOLUTION_ROUNDS.jsonlstate/PIPELINE_STATE.jsonstate/CURRENT_STAGE.jsonstate/HOST_AGENT_HANDOFF.jsonwhen a host-agent handoff is prepared- final research overview when convergence is reached
Sub-skills:
research-confighypothesis-generation-pipelinehypothesis-evolution-loopresearch-overview-pipeline
Required shared references:
../shared-references/artifact-contract.md../shared-references/completion-contract.md../shared-references/policy-contract.md../shared-references/resolved-config-contract.md../shared-references/strategy-contract.md../shared-references/state-contract.md../shared-references/integration-contract.md../shared-references/execution-modes.md../shared-references/schema-index.md
Context Loading:
- Open
../shared-references/integration-contract.md,../shared-references/strategy-contract.md,../shared-references/completion-contract.md, and../shared-references/schema-index.mdbefore dispatching any sub-skill. - Before writing top-level control-plane artifacts, read the exact Python contracts for:
RUN_POLICY.yamlandstate/POLICY_DECISION.jsonfrompackages/agent_contracts/policy.pyresearch_plan/RESEARCH_PLAN.jsonfrompackages/agent_contracts/research_plan.pywhen dispatchingresearch-configstate/RESOLVED_RUN_CONFIG.jsonfrompackages/agent_contracts/resolved_config.pystate/STRATEGY_PLAN.jsonandstate/STRATEGY_DECISIONS.jsonlfrompackages/agent_contracts/strategy_plan.pystate/PIPELINE_STATE.jsonandstate/CURRENT_STAGE.jsonfrompackages/agent_contracts/pipeline_runtime.pystate/EVOLUTION_STATE.jsonandstate/COMPLETION_DECISION.jsonfrompackages/agent_contracts/pipeline_control.py
- If
resumeistrue, inspectstate/PIPELINE_STATE.jsonandstate/CURRENT_STAGE.jsonbefore dispatching any sub-skill. - Preserve existing dashboard links, handoff artifacts, and manifest history during resume work.
Execution Contract:
- Host-agent mode should consume this skill directly from the repository-local
skills/tree. - This top-level skill owns run-level orchestration and control-plane sequencing. It should not manually re-specify field-level hypothesis, review, ranking, or overview payloads that are already owned by downstream skills plus their exact Python contracts.
- Resume and routing decisions must come from persisted artifacts, not hidden process memory.
- Fresh bootstrap may materialize missing control-plane artifacts, but resumed work must preserve existing valid control-plane artifacts and rebuild only the missing ones.
- Before dispatching generation, review, insights, proximity, ranking, or evolution work, refresh
state/STRATEGY_PLAN.json. - Refresh
state/STRATEGY_PLAN.jsonthroughpython -m tools.policy.plan_strategy <run_dir>when resuming persisted routing state for the active round or substage. - Use
python -m tools.policy.plan_strategy <run_dir>when restoring persisted routing state. Add an explicit phase override such as--phase Configuration,--phase Generation, or--phase Evolutiononly when the top-level workflow is intentionally forcing a new stage transition rather than restoring the persisted one. - Use
from tools import sync_pipeline_stage_artifactsas the canonical paired write surface when entering any active substage. - The stage-sync helper is implemented in
packages/run_artifacts/stage_sync.py. - Before dispatching any sub-skill, call
tools.sync_pipeline_stage_artifacts(...)sostate/PIPELINE_STATE.jsonandstate/CURRENT_STAGE.jsonstay aligned. - When a substage is active,
state/PIPELINE_STATE.json currentSkillmust match the canonical skill for thatcurrentPhase. - When a substage is an active runtime phase (
Generation,Evolution,Reflection,Insights from Reviews,Proximity,Ranking, orResearch Overview),state/PIPELINE_STATE.json statusmust berunningunless the run is terminal. Do not leave active work asnot_started. run_configurationis the explicit routing action for preparing or repairingresearch_plan/RESEARCH_PLAN.json. Do not treat configuration as an implicit bootstrap side effect.inspect_stateis a blocked control-plane action. Do not continue automatic generation, review, or evolution work until the persisted routing artifacts are inspected or repaired.- Do not synthesize placeholder hypotheses, reviews, tournaments, proximity receipts, embeddings, or evolution-round receipts to make progress.
- If the required sub-skill or canonical tool cannot be executed, stop and report a resumable blocked state instead of writing low-information artifacts.
- Do not dispatch
hypothesis-generation-pipelineuntilresearch_plan/RESEARCH_PLAN.jsonexists and validates through the canonicalResearchPlanContract. - Generation seeding must follow the active
state/STRATEGY_PLAN.jsonexactly. On a fresh run, execute one generated hypothesis per selected generation strategy instead of collapsing the seed frontier into a single batch summary. - Evolution must remain round-based: one refreshed routing plan, one chosen parent set, one chosen concrete evolution strategy, and at most one new child hypothesis per round.
- A completed evolution round must be replayable from exactly one router decision, one evolved child, one review bundle, one proximity receipt, completed ranking artifacts with ranking update receipt coverage, one convergence update, and one appended round receipt.
- The appended round receipt must include only child-owned, duplicate-free placement/ranked match IDs for that round; do not copy later opponent-side lifetime refs from
HYPOTHESIS.jsoninto an earlierEVOLUTION_ROUNDS.jsonlrecord. - Evolution safety metadata must come from
state/RESOLVED_RUN_CONFIG.json; do not rewriteEVOLUTION_STATE.safetyMaxIterationsfrom the current iteration count or from prompt memory. safety_iteration_limit_reachedis valid only wheniterationCount >= RESOLVED_RUN_CONFIG.convergence.safety_max_iterationsandsafetyLimitHitistrue.completion_drivencontrols stop semantics, whilehuman_checkpointcontrols where the host agent may pause for the user. Do not conflate them.- When the effective policy is
iteration_policy = completion_drivenandhuman_checkpoint = auto, keep executing generation and evolution work autonomously until the routing plan reachesgenerate_overvieworinspect_state, or until validation / safety ceilings block further work. - Treat
completeas a completion-verifier outcome, not as astate/STRATEGY_PLAN.json next_action. - In that autonomous mode, do not ask the user whether to continue after each evolution round or each new child hypothesis.
- If the host-agent turn must stop before a terminal route is reached, say explicitly that the run is paused, convergence has not been reached, persisted state is resumable, and the next recommended action is continue evolution via resume or an explicit continue request.
- When
human_checkpoint = before_overview, pause only after evolution reaches an overview-ready routing state and beforeresearch-overview-pipeline. - When
human_checkpoint = before_completion, pause only after overview work is complete and before final completion writeback. - When
human_checkpoint = every_major_stage, pause only at major stage boundaries and not merely because one evolution child finished.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 130 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 05ef86f2b698
co-scientist-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository panjose/Co-Scientist (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 2,816 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
figure-style
Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots. Use for a figure that will ship in a report, paper, export, or kept artifact. Covers data fidelity, label economy, color threading, chart choice, layout, and render-then-verify QA without imposing a…
remote-compute-ssh
Evaluate and use SSH Remote Compute before choosing where to run GPU, high-memory, parallel, batch, model-inference, bioinformatics, or other long-running scientific work; supports short remote commands and asynchronous jobs with automatic harvest and analysis.
paper-narrative
Judge and reshape the story told by an entire paper figure deck. Use when writing or revising a paper to derive a grounded brief from the manuscript and captions, review the full deck as a handling editor, and hand an ordered figure arc to figure-composer.
esmfold2
Biohub ESMFold2 / ESMFold2-Fast all-atom co-folding (Candido et al. 2026, github.com/Biohub/esm). Single-sequence and MSA modes; protein, DNA, RNA, ligand (CCD/SMILES), modified residues. FoldBench Ab-Ag 50-55%, PPI 70-77% DockQ-pass. Also covers the ESMC-{300M,600M,6B} protein language models from the same release…
literature-review
Find, verify, and synthesize scientific literature — from "what's the seminal paper for X" through full multi-source reviews. Covers grounding claims in real retrieved sources, avoiding fabricated citations, handling retractions, and calibrating confidence to evidence strength.
scvi-tools
Probabilistic single-cell RNA-seq with scvi-tools — scVI for a batch-corrected latent space, scANVI for semi-supervised label transfer, and Bayesian differential expression. Reach for this skill to integrate scRNA-seq batches, embed cells for clustering, transfer annotations from a reference onto a query, or score…