Open Science is a local-first, model-agnostic workbench for reproducible scientific research. Scientists use its AI agents, Python and R execution, data connectors, and traceable outputs for tasks such as literature review, analysis, simulation, and visualization across macOS, Windows, and Linux.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/aipoch/open-science/figure-composernpx skills add aipoch/open-science --skill figure-composergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aipoch/open-scienceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aipoch/open-science/figure-composer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aipoch/open-science/figure-composer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aipoch/open-science/figure-composer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.02110 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01055 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00422 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00211 |
Grade A, and why
figure-composer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 212 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Figure Composer — narrative → panels → compose → adversarial loop
figure-composer is the outer workflow for one multi-panel figure. Use the
figure-style rules while planning and reviewing; every panel worker uses those
rules independently. Run paper-narrative first when the paper-level figure
sequence is still undecided.
Open Science Notebook call
Every notebook_execute request whose code uses a function named in this skill
includes this skill ID:
{ "kernelSkillIds": ["figure-composer"], "code": "print(figure_outline_schema())" }
kernelSkillIds contains the skill ID; function calls belong in code. Call the
named functions directly without an import or discovery step.
Inputs
claim: the one sentence the figure makes true without surrounding prose.dataVersionIds: immutable Upload or Artifact Version identities grounding the panels.width_mm: venue column width, commonly 85–89 mm single or 174–183 mm double.rulesVersionId: immutable Artifact Version containing the design rules used by the composite reviewer.delegatePrefix: short branch-unique prefix for panel and reviewer child names.
Run this workflow only in the Main/root agent. Delegated children cannot call
host.delegate, so the whole composer cannot itself be delegated.
Entry points
- From a claim: Main writes the outline in step 1 from the claim, data, and
figure-stylerules. - From an existing figure: inspect it with
host.viewImage, then have Main draft and review the outline directly. Currenthost.llmcalls do not accept images, so do not add a second hidden inference step. Pixels cannot supply Artifact Version identities; filldata_vidfrom the provided data.
1. Narrative → panel outline
Main produces a panel_outline matching figure_outline_schema():
{
"claim": "…",
"width_mm": 180,
"ncol": 12,
"row_heights_mm": [40, 60, 46, 52],
"panels": [
{
"letter": "a",
"role": "schematic",
"row": 0,
"col": 0,
"colspan": 12,
"chart_family": "schematic overview",
"message": "…",
"data_vid": null,
"ask": "…"
},
{
"letter": "b",
"role": "primary",
"row": 1,
"col": 0,
"colspan": 7,
"chart_family": "scatter + trend",
"message": "…",
"data_vid": "…",
"ask": "…"
}
]
}
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 212 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A b21232537807
figure-composer is a skill published in the GitHub repository aipoch/open-science (3,528 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 2,110 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
build-paper-pipeline
Build the pipeline stages a manuscript's TODO comments ask for.
check-questions
Review a Calkit project's questions and answers against their evidence. Use when the user invokes /calkit:check-questions, asks whether the project's answers are still true, or after a pipeline run changes results that answers cite.
clinical-case-report
Structured medical case presentation for clinical rounds, conferences, and documentation. Generates SOAP-format or narrative case reports with physiologically accurate vitals, labs, and evidence-based plans. Use when the brief mentions "case report", "case presentation", "SOAP note", "clinical case", "ward rounds"…
proof-checker
Rigorous mathematical proof verification and fixing workflow. Reads a LaTeX proof, identifies gaps via cross-model review (external reviewer backend, ultra reasoning), fixes each gap with full derivations, re-reviews, and generates an audit report. Use when user says "检查证明", "verify proof", "proof check", "审证明"…
paper-illustration
Generate publication-quality AI illustrations for academic papers using Gemini image generation. Creates architecture diagrams, method illustrations with Claude-supervised iterative refinement loop. Use when user says "生成图表", "画架构图", "AI绘图", "paper illustration", "generate diagram", or needs visual figures for papers.
paper-illustration-image2
Generate publication-quality academic illustrations through a local Codex app-server bridge that uses Codex native image generation. This is a separate experimental alternative to paper-illustration, intended for Claude Code users who want a GPT-image-style renderer without modifying the original skill.