Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add panjose/Co-Scientist --skill literature-searchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/panjose/Co-ScientistWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/panjose/co-scientist/literature-search)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/panjose/co-scientist/literature-search"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/panjose/co-scientist/literature-search/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/panjose/co-scientist/literature-search"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/panjose/co-scientist/literature-search.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00698 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00349 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
literature-search scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
literature-search
Goal:
- Run the canonical literature search bridge for one evidence query and persist traceable evidence artifacts.
Inputs:
- active run directory
- a
SearchRequestContractpayload or enough context to build one - optional existing
literature/queries/<query_id>/REQUEST.json
Outputs:
literature/queries/<query_id>/REQUEST.jsonliterature/queries/<query_id>/PROVIDER_RECEIPTS.jsonliterature/queries/<query_id>/CANDIDATE_PAPERS.jsonliterature/queries/<query_id>/VERIFIED_PAPERS.jsonliterature/queries/<query_id>/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE.jsonliterature/queries/<query_id>/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE.mdliterature/queries/<query_id>/SEARCH_TRACE.jsonlliterature/bundles/<bundle_id>.json
Context Loading:
- Open
skills/shared-references/schema-index.md. - Open
skills/shared-references/literature-search-contract.md. - Read
packages/agent_contracts/literature.pybefore building or editing a search request or evidence bundle. - Read
tools/literature_search_client.pybefore invoking the bridge.
Execution Contract:
- Import and call
from tools import search_literature. - When the host exposes the configured
co_scientist_search_bridgeMCP server, its tools are an allowed transport for the same canonical bridge. - If the MCP server is unavailable, fall back to the Python tools surface instead of performing informal web search.
- Do not perform informal web search as a substitute for
tools.search_literature(...). - Do not invent papers, DOIs, arXiv IDs, venues, citation counts, or abstracts.
- Preserve provider failure receipts. A failed provider is evidence about retrieval coverage and must not be hidden.
- If
retrieval_metadata.statusisblocked, return that blocked state to the caller instead of fabricating an evidence bundle. - If
retrieval_metadata.statusispartial, downstream callers may continue only when they preserve the partial-source limitation.
Execution Steps:
- Open
skills/shared-references/schema-index.md,skills/shared-references/literature-search-contract.md, andpackages/agent_contracts/literature.py. - Build a
SearchRequestContractwith a stablequery_id,goal,query,query_type,providers,filters, andconsumer. - Call
tools.search_literature(run_dir, request)through the stable tools surface, or call the equivalent configured MCP search bridge tool when it is available. - Read the returned
EvidenceBundleContractand confirm the run-local artifacts were written. - If the bundle status is
blocked, stop and report the blocked retrieval state to the caller. - If the bundle status is
partialorsucceeded, return thebundle_idandquery_idto the caller. - Run
python -m tools.validation.contract_validation <run_dir> --skill literature-search.
Completion Rule:
- This skill is complete only when the search bridge has written a canonical evidence bundle or an auditable blocked retrieval state, and the literature artifacts validate.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 60 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A c7713a00510e
literature-search is a skill published in the GitHub repository panjose/Co-Scientist (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 698 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
figure-style
Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots. Use for a figure that will ship in a report, paper, export, or kept artifact. Covers data fidelity, label economy, color threading, chart choice, layout, and render-then-verify QA without imposing a…
remote-compute-ssh
Evaluate and use SSH Remote Compute before choosing where to run GPU, high-memory, parallel, batch, model-inference, bioinformatics, or other long-running scientific work; supports short remote commands and asynchronous jobs with automatic harvest and analysis.
paper-narrative
Judge and reshape the story told by an entire paper figure deck. Use when writing or revising a paper to derive a grounded brief from the manuscript and captions, review the full deck as a handling editor, and hand an ordered figure arc to figure-composer.
esmfold2
Biohub ESMFold2 / ESMFold2-Fast all-atom co-folding (Candido et al. 2026, github.com/Biohub/esm). Single-sequence and MSA modes; protein, DNA, RNA, ligand (CCD/SMILES), modified residues. FoldBench Ab-Ag 50-55%, PPI 70-77% DockQ-pass. Also covers the ESMC-{300M,600M,6B} protein language models from the same release…
literature-review
Find, verify, and synthesize scientific literature — from "what's the seminal paper for X" through full multi-source reviews. Covers grounding claims in real retrieved sources, avoiding fabricated citations, handling retractions, and calibrating confidence to evidence strength.
scvi-tools
Probabilistic single-cell RNA-seq with scvi-tools — scVI for a batch-corrected latent space, scANVI for semi-supervised label transfer, and Bayesian differential expression. Reach for this skill to integrate scRNA-seq batches, embed cells for clustering, transfer annotations from a reference onto a query, or score…