Continuous-Claude-v3 is a Claude Code development environment that preserves working context between sessions, coordinates specialized agents, and stores project knowledge through ledgers, handoffs, and analysis tools. It is for people using Claude Code on ongoing or complex software work. Its catalogue entries are the skills, agents, hooks, plugin, and setting that provide its workflows and orchestration.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill lebesgue-measuregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/lebesgue-measure)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/lebesgue-measure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/lebesgue-measure/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/lebesgue-measure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/lebesgue-measure.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Agent Snooping · line 63 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00873 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00436 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
lebesgue-measure scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Lebesgue Measure
When to Use
Use this skill when working on lebesgue-measure problems in measure theory.
Decision Tree
-
Outer measure construction
- m*(A) = inf{sum |I_n| : A subset union(I_n)}
sympy_compute.py sum "length(I_n)" --var n
-
Caratheodory criterion
- E is measurable if: m*(A) = m*(A & E) + m*(A & E^c) for all A
z3_solve.py prove "caratheodory_criterion"
-
Lebesgue measure properties
- Translation invariant: m(E + x) = m(E)
- sigma-additive on measurable sets
- m([a,b]) = b - a
-
Regularity theorems
- Inner regularity: m(E) = sup{m(K) : K compact, K subset E}
- Outer regularity: m(E) = inf{m(U) : U open, E subset U}
Tool Commands
Sympy_Outer_Measure
uv run python -m runtime.harness scripts/sympy_compute.py sum "length(I_n)" --var n --from 1 --to oo
Z3_Caratheodory
uv run python -m runtime.harness scripts/z3_solve.py prove "mu(A) == mu(A & E) + mu(A & E_complement)"
Sympy_Borel_Sets
uv run python -m runtime.harness scripts/sympy_compute.py simplify "open_set_countable_union"
Key Techniques
From indexed textbooks:
- [Measure, Integration Real Analysis (... (Z-Library)] Lebesgue measure on the Lebesgue measurable sets does have one small advantage over Lebesgue measure on the Borel sets: every subset of a set with (outer) measure 0 is Lebesgue measurable but is not necessarily a Borel set. However, any natural process that produces a subset of R will produce a Borel set. Thus this small advantage does not often come up in practice.
- [Measure, Integration Real Analysis (... (Z-Library)] B j j You have probably long suspected that not every subset of R is a Borel set. Now j j j j Section 2D Lebesgue Measure restricted to the Borel sets, is a measure. Borel sets Outer measure is a measure on (R, of R.
- [Measure, Integration Real Analysis (... (Z-Library)] The terminology Lebesgue set would make good sense in parallel to the termi- nology Borel set. However, Lebesgue set has another meaning, so we need to use Lebesgue measurable set. Every Lebesgue measurable set differs from a Borel set by a set with outer measure 0.
- [Measure, Integration Real Analysis (... (Z-Library)] If you go at a leisurely pace, then covering Chapters 1–5 in the rst semester may be a good goal. If you go a bit faster, then covering Chapters 1–6 in the rst semester may be more appropriate. For a second-semester course, covering some subset of Chapters 6 through 12 should produce a good course.
- [Measure, Integration Real Analysis (... (Z-Library)] Egorov’s Theorem, which states that pointwise convergence of a sequence of measurable functions is close to uniform convergence, has multiple applications in later chapters. Luzin’s Theorem, back in the context of R, sounds spectacular but has no other uses in this book and thus can be skipped if you are pressed for time. Chapter 4: The highlight of this chapter is the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem, which allows us to differentiate an integral.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 64 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A f2ba2c377310
lebesgue-measure is a skill published in the GitHub repository parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 (3,938 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 873 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-discover
Use when searching for academic papers related to a topic, finding papers similar to one already in the vault, or discovering research gaps. Triggers on "find papers", "related papers", "paper search", "literature", "what papers should I read about X".
fizzy-workflow
Use for guided Fizzy.do workflows: "set up Fizzy", "configure Fizzy for this project", "sync my work to Fizzy", "review my Fizzy progress", "end of session cleanup". Provides step-by-step guidance for common operations.
tooluniverse-pharmacogenomics
Pharmacogenomics (PGx) research — drug-gene interactions (CPIC, PharmGKB), CPIC dosing guidelines, variant-drug-response associations, ethnic-allele-frequency considerations, and metabolizer-status scoring. Use for PGx-informed dosing recommendations, CYP/HLA pharmacogenomic allele interpretation, and…
tooluniverse-variant-analysis
VCF and variant analysis — parsing, annotation, classification (synonymous, missense, frameshift, stopgained), VAF filtering, coding vs non-coding categorization, multi-condition variant comparison. Use for VCF parsing, variant fraction calculations (denominator = coding subset only, NOT all variants), and per-sample…
tooluniverse-variant-to-mechanism
End-to-end variant-to-mechanism analysis — trace a variant (rsID/coordinates) through regulatory context, target gene(s), molecular pathway(s), and phenotypic consequences. Integrates 7+ databases across 3 evidence layers (regulatory, molecular, disease) for a mechanistic model. Use for GWAS-hit-to-mechanism…
tooluniverse-epidemiological-analysis
End-to-end observational epidemiology analysis — from research question (PECO Population/Exposure/Comparator/Outcome) to publication-ready statistical report. Covers cohort/case-control/cross-sectional design, regression with confounders, propensity scoring, sensitivity analysis. Writes Python code for every step. Use…