claude-code-my-workflow is a forkable setup for using Claude Code to produce and review academic papers, slides, data analyses, and replication packages. Researchers use its agents, skills, rules, hooks, and quality checks to coordinate these tasks and verify their results. The catalogue entries define the reusable workflow components for Claude Code.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill pedagogy-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/pedagogy-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/pedagogy-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/pedagogy-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/pedagogy-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/pedagogy-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.00386 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00193 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
pedagogy-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Pedagogical Review of Lecture Slides
Perform a comprehensive pedagogical review.
Steps
-
Identify the file specified in
$ARGUMENTS- If no argument, ask user which lecture to review
- If just a name, look in
Quarto/orSlides/
-
Launch the pedagogy-reviewer agent with the full file path
- The agent checks 13 pedagogical patterns
- Performs deck-level analysis (narrative arc, pacing, visual rhythm, notation)
- Considers student perspective (prerequisites, objections)
-
The agent produces a report saved to:
quality_reports/[FILENAME_WITHOUT_EXT]_pedagogy_report.md -
Present summary to user:
- Patterns followed vs violated (out of 13)
- Deck-level assessments
- Critical recommendations (top 3-5)
Important Notes
- This is a read-only review — no files are edited
- Focuses on pedagogy not visual layout (use
/visual-auditfor that) - For a combined review, use
/slide-excellenceinstead
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 37 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A d855e6c7460e
pedagogy-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,570 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 386 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-workflow
A staged workflow for producing an evidence-based economics or social-science research paper, from choosing a topic through submission. It coordinates existing tools and analysis options, including Python, Stata, and R.
r-econometrics
Run IV, DiD, and RDD analyses in R with proper diagnostics.
econ-management-paper-polish
A writing and editing guide for papers in economics, management, finance, accounting, marketing, information systems, public administration, and related fields.
econometrics-phd-level
A guide to econometrics, the use of statistics to study relationships in data, based on a 12-part Korean lecture series. It routes questions to explanations of topics such as regression, panel data, instrumental variables, and causal comparisons.
did-causal
Use this Skill when the user needs to estimate causal treatment effects using difference-in-differences (DID) designs: two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regression, parallel trends pre-testing, Callaway-Sant'Anna staggered adoption estimator, and Goodman-Bacon decomposition. Covers both Python (linearmodels) and R (did…
principal-agent
A Chinese-language guide based on the principal-agent idea: the person who owns a decision or its result may have different incentives from someone acting on another person's behalf. It applies this lens to jobs, companies, and partnerships.