Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/poshan0126/dotclaude/shipnpx skills add poshan0126/dotclaude --skill shipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/poshan0126/dotclaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/poshan0126/dotclaude/ship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/poshan0126/dotclaude/ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/poshan0126/dotclaude/ship.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.01020 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00510 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00204 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
ship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ship the current changes through commit, push, and PR creation. Confirm with the user before each step using the AskUserQuestion tool.
Step 1: Scan
Current scan state (injected read-only below — no need to re-run these to gather it):
- Status: !
git -C "${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR:-.}" status --short 2>/dev/null || echo "(no git repo or no changes)" - Change summary: !
git -C "${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR:-.}" diff --stat HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo "(no diff)" - Recent commit style: !
git -C "${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR:-.}" log --oneline -5 2>/dev/null || echo "(no commits yet)"
For the full patch of a specific file before committing, run git diff -- <file> on demand (kept out of the injection to hold the render small).
- Present a clear summary to the user:
- Files modified
- Files added
- Files deleted
- Untracked files
- If there are no changes, tell the user and stop
Step 2: Stage & Commit
- Propose which files to stage. Never stage these:
- Secrets:
.env*,*.pem,*.key,credentials.json - Lock files:
package-lock.json,yarn.lock,pnpm-lock.yaml(unless intentionally updated) - Generated:
*.gen.ts,*.generated.*,*.min.js,*.min.css - Build output:
dist/,build/,.next/,__pycache__/ - Dependencies:
node_modules/,vendor/,.venv/ - OS/editor:
.DS_Store,Thumbs.db,*.swp,.idea/,.vscode/settings.json
- Secrets:
- Draft a commit message based on the changes, matching the repo's existing commit style
- ASK the user to confirm or edit: show the exact files to stage and the proposed commit message
- Only after confirmation: stage the files and create the commit
- If the commit fails (e.g., pre-commit hook), fix the issue and try again with a NEW commit
Step 3: Push
- Check if the current branch has an upstream remote
- If not, propose creating one with
git push -u origin <branch> - ASK the user to confirm before pushing
- Only after confirmation: push to remote
Step 4: Pull Request
- Check if a PR already exists for this branch (
gh pr view. If it exists, show the URL and stop) - Analyze ALL commits on this branch vs the base branch (not just the latest commit)
- Draft a PR title (under 72 chars) and body with:
- Summary: 2-4 bullet points
- Test plan: how to verify
- ASK the user to confirm or edit the title and body
- Only after confirmation: create the PR with
gh pr create - Show the PR URL when done
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 88 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 55cd321785ee
ship is a skill published in the GitHub repository poshan0126/dotclaude (860 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,020 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-automation
GitHub workflow automation, PR management, issue tracking, and code review coordination. Integrates with GitHub Actions and repository management. Use when: PR creation, code review, issue management, release automation, workflow setup. Skip when: local-only changes, non-GitHub repositories.
crew-commit
Canonical commit workflow for Gas Town crew members: pre-flight checks, branch creation, gt commit with agent identity, push, and PR creation. Use when ready to commit and submit work for review.
cherry-pick
Cherry-pick a commit from main to a Sui release branch, create the release PR, and report the PR URL.
task-snapshot
Create a commit or tag snapshot only when explicitly requested for a milestone, reproducibility checkpoint, handoff, or pinned artifact.
mflux-pr
Make a clean PR in mflux (inspect diff, quick verification, commit, push, open PR) using repo conventions.
comet-safe-delivery
在保护无关脏改动、关联 worktree、子模块和用户明确边界的前提下,提交、推送、合并或完成范围明确的 Comet 变更。用户要求提交、推送、合并回目标分支、清理 worktree 或交付已准备好的改动时使用。.