Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PostOakLabs/ainumbers --skill casp-authorization-pathgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PostOakLabs/ainumbersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/casp-authorization-path)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/casp-authorization-path"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/casp-authorization-path/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/casp-authorization-path"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/casp-authorization-path.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00548 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
casp-authorization-path scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
CASP authorization path
Am I a MiCA CASP, what own funds do I need, and is my surveillance MAR-ready?
Prompt
Scope your MiCA CASP posture with each answer under a receipt.
- Call run_mica_casp_fit with your synthetic service inventory (which crypto-asset services you render, to whom). Record the fit verdict per service.
- Call assess_mica_casp_readiness for the authorization gap list. Record each gap with its class.
- Call calculate_mica_own_funds on the synthetic balance sheet. Record the computed own-funds requirement and which of the three bases binds.
- Call assess_mar_crypto_surveillance on a synthetic order/transaction sample. Record the coverage verdict and the flagged patterns.
- Pick the one gap that blocks authorization first; state the evidence the reviewer will ask for.
- build_session_receipt over the four runs; give me the ledger link.
- Write the board note: the fit verdict, the own-funds number, the top gap, and the ledger link. Say plainly that these are deterministic self-assessments from your inputs, not a regulator's determination. Call shape: every ChainGraph node tool takes its arguments nested under one wrapper object, e.g. {"policy_parameters": { ... }}; flat arguments are discarded by schema validation. If a named tool is not in your tool list, call call_tool with { "name": "", "arguments": { … } }. It runs the same validation and returns the same receipt.
How to run
Connect an MCP-capable host to https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp, then give the prompt above to the assistant.
Use synthetic inputs only. Never paste personal or production data.
Verify what came back
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed 7bb0a5827611
- 19d ago First seen · 40 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A a9ceb1281cff
casp-authorization-path is a skill published in the GitHub repository PostOakLabs/ainumbers (11 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 548 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-27.
Other skills, from other repositories
category-designer
Define a new category where your product wins by default. Reframe the buying decision. Triggers on: "create a category", "category design", "define my category", "category of one", "reframe the market", "position as category king", "new category", "category creation", "own a category", "category strategy"…
draft-incorporation-package-adgm-sboghossian
Use when preparing an incorporation package for an Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) company. Covers ADGM Registrar process, private company (LTD) structure, ARES authorized representative requirements, common-law jurisdiction and ADGM Courts, minimum USD 50K capital, strong digital-asset / crypto regulatory framework…
fsi-compliance-checker
Maps code, architecture, and infrastructure changes to specific control IDs in PCI-DSS v4.0 and MAS TRM (Singapore financial regulator), producing an audit-traceable findings report with per-control remediation.
onboarding
Full KYC customer onboarding with mandatory Step 0 independent verification (5+1 searches), 17 sequential stagegates requiring explicit analyst consent, deterministic four-factor risk scoring, case folder auto-creation, 4-sheet Excel dashboard, 17-section PDF report, and immutable audit trail. Covers UK/EU (AMLD5), US…
risk-assessment
Deterministic heuristic risk scoring using a four-factor weighted model (Geographic 30%, Customer 35%, Product 25%, Channel 10%) aligned with Basel III, EBA Guidelines, FATF standards, and FinCEN guidance. Bands: LOW (0-20), MEDIUM (21-60), HIGH (61-80), CRITICAL (81-100).
screening
Comprehensive sanctions and PEP screening against 12+ databases (OFAC, EU, UK, UN, INTERPOL) with false positive assessment, HITL decision gates, and regulatory-compliant documentation.