Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PostOakLabs/ainumbers --skill is-this-counterparty-realgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PostOakLabs/ainumbersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/is-this-counterparty-real)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/is-this-counterparty-real"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/is-this-counterparty-real/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/is-this-counterparty-real"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/is-this-counterparty-real.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00548 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
is-this-counterparty-real scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Is this counterparty real?
Check the LEI, its relationships, and the GLEIF snapshot digest before you onboard them.
Prompt
Onboarding check for one counterparty, with every claim re-verifiable.
- Get the counterparty's LEI from their paperwork. Do not accept a name alone.
- Call lei_kyb_check on the LEI. Record the registered status, entity type, and any exceptions.
- Call check_lei_relationship_consistency to pull the relationship tree (parents, children). Flag any relationship your onboarding form does not mention.
- Call digest_gleif_snapshot on the GLEIF snapshot file covering today. Record the snapshot digest; this is the public dataset your conclusions rest on.
- If the counterparty presented a SAID, call acdc_said_check on it and record whether it resolves.
- Give me the ledger link for the session receipt covering all four checks (build_session_receipt if your client does not build it automatically).
- Write the onboarding note for the KYC reviewer: what was checked, against which snapshot digest, what matched, what needs a human call, and the ledger link. Call shape: every ChainGraph node tool takes its arguments nested under one wrapper object, e.g. {"policy_parameters": { ... }}; flat arguments are discarded by schema validation. If a named tool is not in your tool list, call call_tool with { "name": "", "arguments": { … } }. It runs the same validation and returns the same receipt.
How to run
Connect an MCP-capable host to https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp, then give the prompt above to the assistant.
Use synthetic inputs only. Never paste personal or production data.
Verify what came back
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed b51c5c1a2e7b
- 19d ago First seen · 40 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 0feeeea0e90e
is-this-counterparty-real is a skill published in the GitHub repository PostOakLabs/ainumbers (11 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 548 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-27.
Other skills, from other repositories
risk-assessment
Deterministic heuristic risk scoring using a four-factor weighted model (Geographic 30%, Customer 35%, Product 25%, Channel 10%) aligned with Basel III, EBA Guidelines, FATF standards, and FinCEN guidance. Bands: LOW (0-20), MEDIUM (21-60), HIGH (61-80), CRITICAL (81-100).
transaction-monitoring
AML transaction monitoring for ongoing customer relationships. Identifies suspicious patterns including structuring, layering, and unusual activity. Assesses against regulatory thresholds and prepares Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) with HITL decision gates.
sox-itgc
Expert SOX IT General Controls (ITGC) advisor for finance, internal audit and IT compliance teams. Covers the four ITGC domains external auditors test for SOX 404 — access to programs and data, program changes, computer operations, and program development — plus scoping in-scope systems from the financial statements…
bankruptcy-monitor-qcc
A Chinese-language monitoring skill for warning about company bankruptcy and restructuring risks through Qichacha data. Qichacha is a Chinese business-information service; bankruptcy restructuring is a legal process for trying to reorganize a company's debts and operations.
leiloeiro-risco
Analise de risco em leiloes de imoveis. Score 36 pontos, riscos juridicos/financeiros/operacionais, stress test 4 cenarios e ROI ponderado por risco.
recht-schulden-momarcode1
Austrian debt and insolvency law — debt management, Mahnverfahren, payment plans (Ratenzahlung), wage garnishment (Lohnpfaendung), existenzminimum, personal insolvency (Schuldenregulierungsverfahren), Schuldnerberatung, and debt collection (Inkasso).