Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-mcaf-source-controlgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-mcaf-source-control)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-mcaf-source-control"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-mcaf-source-control/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-mcaf-source-control"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-mcaf-source-control.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.00814 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00407 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00163 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-mcaf-source-control scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to dotnet-mcaf-source-control — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 100 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MCAF: Source Control
Trigger On
- bootstrapping source-control policy
- tightening branch, merge, or PR rules
- documenting commit or release hygiene
- dealing with secrets-in-git or repository structure issues
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- CI/CD workflow design with no source-control policy change
- one-off git commands that do not alter repo policy
Inputs
- current branching and merge flow
- release strategy and versioning expectations
- secret-handling and repository-structure constraints
Quick Start
- Read the nearest
AGENTS.mdand confirm scope and constraints. - Run this skill's
Workflowthrough theRalph Loopuntil outcomes are acceptable. - Return the
Required Result Formatwith concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
- Agree on merge and release strategy before scaling implementation.
- Keep branch and PR rules explicit in-repo.
- Treat secrets in git history as a critical incident, not cleanup noise.
- Use concrete policy language, not hand-waving.
Deliver
- clear branch and merge strategy
- updated contribution or governance docs
- safer repository hygiene around commits, PRs, and secrets
Validate
- naming and merge rules are explicit
- release/versioning implications are documented where needed
- secret hygiene is treated as policy, not tribal knowledge
Ralph Loop
Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.
- Brainstorm first (mandatory):
- analyze current state
- define the problem, target outcome, constraints, and risks
- generate options and think through trade-offs before committing
- capture the recommended direction and open questions
- Plan second (mandatory):
- write a detailed execution plan from the chosen direction
- list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
- Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
- Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
- Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
- Update the plan after each iteration.
- Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
- If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return
status: not_applicablewith explicit reason and fallback path.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 100 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A d50907fff65e
dotnet-mcaf-source-control is a skill published in the GitHub repository Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills (10 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 814 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to dotnet-mcaf-source-control, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
source-control
Commit message format and release PR process. Use when ready to commit or push a release; use task-transitions for task close/review gates.
github-automation
GitHub workflow automation, PR management, issue tracking, and code review coordination. Integrates with GitHub Actions and repository management. Use when: PR creation, code review, issue management, release automation, workflow setup. Skip when: local-only changes, non-GitHub repositories.
changelog
Auto-generates a changelog from git commits, sprint data, and design documents. Produces both internal and player-facing versions.
git-workflow
Guides you through Git workflows — branching strategies, commit conventions, merge conflict resolution, and release management. Use when working with Git repositories or when the user asks about version control best practices.
development-workflow
Detailed development workflow with modular patterns for git, review, testing, and deployment.
git-push
A GitHub publishing workflow that handles first-time uploads, routine updates, and tagged releases. Git is a system for recording code changes, while GitHub hosts repositories and releases online.