Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill measure-experiment-designgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/measure-experiment-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/measure-experiment-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/measure-experiment-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/measure-experiment-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/measure-experiment-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00886 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00443 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00177 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
measure-experiment-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- measure-experiment-design — 94% identical, 16 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Experiment Design
An experiment design document defines all parameters needed to run a rigorous A/B test or controlled experiment. It ensures the team aligns on what you're testing, how you'll measure success, and how long to run the test before drawing conclusions. Good experiment design prevents common pitfalls: underpowered tests, unclear success criteria, and decisions based on noise rather than signal.
When to Use
- Before launching an A/B test to validate a product change
- When testing a hypothesis that requires quantitative validation
- After solution design to validate assumptions before full rollout
- When stakeholders want data-driven evidence for a decision
- To establish a culture of experimentation and learning
When NOT to Use
- The hypothesis itself is not yet articulated -> use
define-hypothesisfirst; this skill designs the test for a claim you already have - You are analyzing a completed experiment -> use
measure-experiment-results - You need the event tracking that will measure the experiment -> use
measure-instrumentation-spec - You are gathering opinions rather than running a controlled test -> use
measure-survey-analysis
Instructions
When asked to design an experiment, follow these steps:
-
Articulate the Hypothesis Write a clear, testable hypothesis in the format: "We believe [change] for [users] will [outcome] as measured by [metric]." One hypothesis per experiment - if you're testing multiple things, run multiple experiments.
-
Define the Variants Describe the control (current experience) and treatment (new experience) in sufficient detail. Include screenshots, mockups, or precise descriptions so anyone can understand what users will see.
-
Choose Primary and Secondary Metrics Select one primary metric that will determine success or failure. Add 2-3 secondary metrics to understand the broader impact. Include guardrail metrics to catch unintended negative effects.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 79 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A f6f2f4d84cda
measure-experiment-design is a skill published in the GitHub repository product-on-purpose/pm-skills (663 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 886 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
idea-validator
Use when the user asks to validate a product idea, stress-test an idea, evaluate whether an idea is good, or decide whether to build something. Do NOT use for prioritizing an existing backlog or reviewing a shipped feature — those need RICE scoring or a design review instead.
product-designer
Use when the user asks to review a design, critique a UI or mockup, give design feedback, or check a screen for usability and accessibility issues. Do NOT use for visual brand or aesthetic preference debates, or for reviewing copy before layout is settled.
status-update-writer
Use when the user asks to write a status update, weekly or monthly update, stakeholder update, project update, standup, status report, or QBR. Do NOT use for writing a PRD or a retro doc — those need different structures.
linkedin-post-writer
Use when the user asks to write, draft, or rewrite a LinkedIn post, turn notes or an article into a LinkedIn post, or fix a hook that is not landing. Do NOT use for X/Twitter threads, newsletters, or blog posts — those need different length and hook rules.
prompt-engineer
Use when the user asks to improve, optimize, rewrite, debug, or shorten a prompt, or asks why a prompt is producing bad output. Do NOT use for writing a Claude Code SKILL.md — that needs skill structure rules, not prompt techniques.
spec-from-conversation
Turn an unstructured stakeholder conversation, Slack thread, or meeting transcript into a structured spec (problem, goals, non-goals, success metrics, open questions). Use whenever a PM has raw conversational input and needs a first-draft spec, or when someone says "can you turn this into a doc" after a discussion.…