Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add qfoldit/Protein-Design-MCP --skill oilgasgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qfoldit/Protein-Design-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qfoldit/protein-design-mcp/oilgas)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qfoldit/protein-design-mcp/oilgas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qfoldit/protein-design-mcp/oilgas/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qfoldit/protein-design-mcp/oilgas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qfoldit/protein-design-mcp/oilgas.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00135 | $0.01034 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.00517 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
qfoldit-oilgas scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
qfoldit-oilgas (corrosion)
Kinetic/empirical model for internal CO2 corrosion of carbon steel oil & gas pipelines, built on the published de Waard-Milliams correlation plus three well-documented secondary effects: protective FeCO3 scale suppression at higher temperature, flow-driven mass-transfer enhancement (with an erosion-corrosion regime at high velocity), and a chloride/ salinity-driven pitting risk indicator.
Read references/model_documentation.md before answering -- it has
the full equations, the model's valid range, calibration status, and
critical caveats (the base correlation and secondary-effect parameters
are generic literature values, not fitted to any specific qFoldIT
pipeline/field until real coupon/ER-probe/field data is supplied).
How to handle a request
- Gather inputs: temperature (C), CO2 partial pressure (bar) -- estimate from total pressure x CO2 mole fraction if not given directly -- flow velocity (m/s), salinity (ppt, default seawater ~35 if offshore/produced-water context implies it), and whether a corrosion inhibitor is in use (and its claimed efficiency, typically 80-95% if properly maintained -- ask rather than assume if not stated).
- Validate ranges: the de Waard-Milliams correlation's empirical basis is roughly T=5-150C, pCO2=0.1-10 bar. Flag extrapolation outside this rather than presenting it with the same confidence.
- Run
scripts/corrosion_kinetics.py:predict_corrosion_rate(...)for the uniform corrosion rate + pitting risk factor;remaining_life_years(...)if wall thickness is known or asked about. - Always separate uniform corrosion rate from pitting risk -- they are different corrosion modes (general metal loss vs. localized perforation risk) and should never be combined into one number or implied to be interchangeable.
- State calibration status with any numeric forecast: the base
correlation is a widely-used published one, but the scale-suppression
and flow-enhancement terms are simplified approximations calibrated to
generic literature shapes, not to any specific pipeline. If the user
has field/coupon corrosion data, use
fit_dewaard_offset_from_datato calibrate a site-specific correction factor before forecasting. - Remaining-life estimates assume a constant rate -- flag this explicitly; real field conditions (water cut, temperature, inhibitor availability) change over time, so this is a first-order screening number, not a substitute for an inspection program.
- The flow/mass-transfer factor here is a deliberately simplified proxy, not a reproduction of the full de Waard 1995 Sherwood-type mass-transfer equation (which needs diffusion coefficient, viscosity, and hydraulic diameter -- inputs this skill doesn't collect). It captures the same two qualitative behaviors (mass-transfer-limited at low velocity, erosion-corrosion above an erosional threshold) but should not be presented as numerically equivalent to the full published model. Say so if asked how this compares to NORSOK M-506 or the full de Waard 1995 equation.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 78 lines · 135 tokens per session scan A 516a183d072a
qfoldit-oilgas is a skill published in the GitHub repository qfoldit/Protein-Design-MCP (1 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 135 tokens to every session and 1,034 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
instrument-data-to-allotrope
Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…
exploratory-data-analysis
Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files. Use for redacted CSV/TSV/JSON profiles; optional NumPy, HDF5, FASTA/FASTQ, and basic image metadata inspection; missingness/leakage audits; outlier and transformation sensitivity; and rigorous EDA report scaffolds. Other domain…
matlab
Build, review, migrate, and safely plan MATLAB or GNU Octave numerical workflows, including arrays, tabular/time data, tests, projects, graphics, MAT files, and explicit Python interoperability.
phylogenetics
Build and analyze phylogenetic trees using MAFFT (multiple alignment), IQ-TREE 2 (maximum likelihood), and FastTree (fast NJ/ML). Visualize with ETE3 or FigTree. For evolutionary analysis, microbial genomics, viral phylodynamics, protein family analysis, and molecular clock studies.
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
mapping-to-snomed
Maps clinical concept spans extracted by OpenMed to SNOMED CT concepts through a USER-SUPPLIED terminology server (the user's own Ontoserver, Snowstorm, or UMLS/UTS), never a bundled vocabulary. Use when the user wants to code findings, disorders, procedures, body structures, or substances to SNOMED CT, run an ECL…