Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rafaelandrade74/spec-forge --skill speckit-clarifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rafaelandrade74/spec-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rafaelandrade74/spec-forge/speckit-clarify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rafaelandrade74/spec-forge/speckit-clarify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rafaelandrade74/spec-forge/speckit-clarify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rafaelandrade74/spec-forge/speckit-clarify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rafaelandrade74/spec-forge/speckit-clarify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.03026 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.01210 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00605 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00303 |
Grade A, and why
speckit-clarify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 215 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Spec-Forge Setup (replaces file-based Pre-Execution Checks)
- Read
.specify/feature.json(written by/speckit-specify) to getspec_forge_feature_id.- If the file is missing or has no
spec_forge_feature_id, instruct the user to run/speckit-specifyfirst (do not create a new feature here) and stop.
- If the file is missing or has no
- Call
get_feature_snapshotwith{ featureId }to load the current specification content, the active constitution, and any existing clarifications. This is the in-memory equivalent of loadingFEATURE_SPECand.specify/memory/constitution.mdin the original command — there is nocheck-prerequisites.ps1step needed.
Outline
Goal: Detect and reduce ambiguity or missing decision points in the active feature specification and record the clarifications directly via Spec-Forge's clarify_ask / clarify_answer tools (Spec-Forge models clarifications as first-class Q&A rows tied to the feature — there is no ## Clarifications markdown section to append to).
Note: This clarification workflow is expected to run (and be completed) BEFORE invoking /speckit-plan. If the user explicitly states they are skipping clarification (e.g., exploratory spike), you may proceed, but must warn that downstream rework risk increases.
Execution steps:
-
Use the specification content loaded in Spec-Forge Setup step 2 as the artifact under review.
-
Perform a structured ambiguity & coverage scan using this taxonomy. For each category, mark status: Clear / Partial / Missing. Produce an internal coverage map used for prioritization (do not output raw map unless no questions will be asked).
Functional Scope & Behavior:
- Core user goals & success criteria
- Explicit out-of-scope declarations
- User roles / personas differentiation
Domain & Data Model:
- Entities, attributes, relationships
- Identity & uniqueness rules
- Lifecycle/state transitions
- Data volume / scale assumptions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 215 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 729d6de8bfe6
speckit-clarify is a skill published in the GitHub repository rafaelandrade74/spec-forge (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 3,026 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
artifact-conventions
Defines preservation, format, and section rules for SDD specification artifacts (spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, checklists). Use when editing feature-artifact files under specs/ / to prevent accidental corruption of cross-referenced IDs, priorities, and gating state.
plan-authoring
Reference material for writing implementation plans (technical context, architecture decisions, data models, API contracts, project-instructions alignment). Loaded on demand by plan-feature; not directly invokable.
task-generation
Reference material with the canonical task-format grammar and decomposition rules for plan-to-tasks expansion. Loaded on demand by generate-tasks; not directly invokable.
evidence-led-authoring
Shared bootstrap-owner contract for evidence-backed brownfield candidates, provenance, and imported baseline coverage.
adr-authoring
Defines the canonical MADR format, lifecycle rules, numbering policy, and SAD catalog contract for standalone ADRs under specs/adrs/.
project-guidelines-writer
Use this skill when the user wants repository guidance documents generated or refreshed, including AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, STYLEGUIDE.md, TESTING.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, and SECURITY.md. It reviews all six documents by default, creates missing files as tool-independent Markdown, applies only justified incremental…