Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rafaelandrade74/spec-forge --skill speckit-clarifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rafaelandrade74/spec-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rafaelandrade74/spec-forge/speckit-clarify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rafaelandrade74/spec-forge/speckit-clarify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rafaelandrade74/spec-forge/speckit-clarify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rafaelandrade74/spec-forge/speckit-clarify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rafaelandrade74/spec-forge/speckit-clarify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.03026 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01513 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00605 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00303 |
Grade A, and why
speckit-clarify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 215 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Spec-Forge Setup (replaces file-based Pre-Execution Checks)
- Read
.specify/feature.json(written by/speckit-specify) to getspec_forge_feature_id.- If the file is missing or has no
spec_forge_feature_id, instruct the user to run/speckit-specifyfirst (do not create a new feature here) and stop.
- If the file is missing or has no
- Call
get_feature_snapshotwith{ featureId }to load the current specification content, the active constitution, and any existing clarifications. This is the in-memory equivalent of loadingFEATURE_SPECand.specify/memory/constitution.mdin the original command — there is nocheck-prerequisites.ps1step needed.
Outline
Goal: Detect and reduce ambiguity or missing decision points in the active feature specification and record the clarifications directly via Spec-Forge's clarify_ask / clarify_answer tools (Spec-Forge models clarifications as first-class Q&A rows tied to the feature — there is no ## Clarifications markdown section to append to).
Note: This clarification workflow is expected to run (and be completed) BEFORE invoking /speckit-plan. If the user explicitly states they are skipping clarification (e.g., exploratory spike), you may proceed, but must warn that downstream rework risk increases.
Execution steps:
-
Use the specification content loaded in Spec-Forge Setup step 2 as the artifact under review.
-
Perform a structured ambiguity & coverage scan using this taxonomy. For each category, mark status: Clear / Partial / Missing. Produce an internal coverage map used for prioritization (do not output raw map unless no questions will be asked).
Functional Scope & Behavior:
- Core user goals & success criteria
- Explicit out-of-scope declarations
- User roles / personas differentiation
Domain & Data Model:
- Entities, attributes, relationships
- Identity & uniqueness rules
- Lifecycle/state transitions
- Data volume / scale assumptions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 215 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 729d6de8bfe6
speckit-clarify is a skill published in the GitHub repository rafaelandrade74/spec-forge (0 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 3,026 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
artifact-conventions
Defines preservation, format, and section rules for SDD specification artifacts (spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, checklists). Use when editing feature-artifact files under specs/ / to prevent accidental corruption of cross-referenced IDs, priorities, and gating state.
plan-authoring
Reference material for writing implementation plans (technical context, architecture decisions, data models, API contracts, project-instructions alignment). Loaded on demand by plan-feature; not directly invokable.
task-generation
Reference material with the canonical task-format grammar and decomposition rules for plan-to-tasks expansion. Loaded on demand by generate-tasks; not directly invokable.
adr-authoring
Defines the canonical MADR format, lifecycle rules, numbering policy, and SAD catalog contract for standalone ADRs under specs/adrs/.
implementation-standards
Reference material with coding standards (defensive coding, error handling, testing patterns). Loaded on demand by the Developer sub-agent (.github/agents/developer.md); not directly invokable.
spec-authoring
Reference material for writing product, technical, and operational specifications (work-item priorities, requirement families, success criteria). Loaded on demand by specify-feature; not directly invokable.