Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add raja21068/AutoResearch --skill research-wikigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/raja21068/AutoResearchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/research-wiki)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/research-wiki"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/research-wiki/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/research-wiki"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/research-wiki.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.04208 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.02104 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00842 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00421 |
Grade A, and why
research-wiki scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to research-wiki — 116 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 410 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Research Wiki: Persistent Research Knowledge Base
Subcommand: $ARGUMENTS
Overview
The research wiki is a persistent, per-project knowledge base that accumulates structured knowledge across the entire ARIS research lifecycle. Unlike one-off literature surveys that are used and forgotten, the wiki compounds — every paper read, idea tested, experiment run, and review received makes the wiki smarter.
Inspired by Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern: compile knowledge once, keep it current, don't re-derive on every query.
Core Concepts
Four Entity Types
| Entity | Directory | Node ID format | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper | papers/ |
paper:<slug> |
A published or preprint research paper |
| Idea | ideas/ |
idea:<id> |
A research idea (proposed, tested, or failed) |
| Experiment | experiments/ |
exp:<id> |
A concrete experiment run with results |
| Claim | claims/ |
claim:<id> |
A testable scientific claim with evidence status |
Typed Relationships (graph/edges.jsonl)
| Edge type | From → To | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
extends |
paper → paper | Builds on prior work |
contradicts |
paper → paper | Disagrees with results/claims |
addresses_gap |
paper|idea → gap | Targets a known field gap |
inspired_by |
idea → paper | Idea sourced from this paper |
tested_by |
idea|claim → exp | Tested in this experiment |
supports |
exp → claim|idea | Experiment confirms claim |
invalidates |
exp → claim|idea | Experiment disproves claim |
supersedes |
paper → paper | Newer work replaces older |
Edges are stored in graph/edges.jsonl only. The ## Connections section on each page is auto-generated from the graph — never hand-edit it.
Wiki Directory Structure
research-wiki/
index.md # categorical index (auto-generated)
log.md # append-only timeline
gap_map.md # field gaps with stable IDs (G1, G2, ...)
query_pack.md # compressed summary for /idea-creator (auto-generated, max 8000 chars)
papers/
<slug>.md # one page per paper
ideas/
<idea_id>.md # one page per idea
experiments/
<exp_id>.md # one page per experiment
claims/
<claim_id>.md # one page per testable claim
graph/
edges.jsonl # materialized current relationship graph
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 410 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A b5588aeda690
research-wiki is a skill published in the GitHub repository raja21068/AutoResearch (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 4,208 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to research-wiki, differing in 116 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
content-refinement-agent
Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Iteratively refine drafts/paper.tex by simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions, with strict accept/revert halt rules, deterministic 0-100 decision bands (Accept/Minor/Major/Reject) that drive a target-met early stop, and a Devil's Advocate…
section-writing-agent
Step 4 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). ONE single multimodal LLM call that drafts the remaining paper sections (Abstract, Methodology, Experiments, Conclusion), extracts numeric values from experimentallog.md into LaTeX booktabs tables, splices the generated figures from Step 2, and merges…
outline-agent
Step 1 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Convert (idea.md, experimentallog.md, template.tex, conferenceguidelines.md) into a strict JSON outline containing a plotting plan, literature search plan (Intro + Related Work), and section-level writing plan with citation hints. TRIGGER when the orchestrator…
paper-autoraters
Run the four paper-quality autoraters from PaperOrchestra (arXiv:2604.05018, App. F.3) — Citation F1 (P0/P1 partition + Precision/Recall/F1), Literature Review Quality (6-axis 0-100 with anti-inflation rules), SxS Overall Paper Quality (side-by-side), and SxS Literature Review Quality (side-by-side). TRIGGER when the…
plotting-agent
Step 2 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Execute the visualization plan from outline.json — render plots and conceptual diagrams from experimentallog.md and idea.md, optionally refine via VLM critique loop, and produce context-aware captions. Runs in parallel with the literature-review-agent. TRIGGER…
paper-writing-bench
Reverse-engineer raw materials (Sparse idea, Dense idea, experimental log) from an existing AI research paper to build a benchmark case for evaluating paper-writing pipelines. Replicates the PaperWritingBench dataset construction procedure from arXiv:2604.05018 §3 / App. C. TRIGGER when the user asks to "build a…