Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add raven-sourav/pmm-content-engine --skill visualgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/raven-sourav/pmm-content-engineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/raven-sourav/pmm-content-engine/visual)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/raven-sourav/pmm-content-engine/visual"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/raven-sourav/pmm-content-engine/visual/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/raven-sourav/pmm-content-engine/visual"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/raven-sourav/pmm-content-engine/visual.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01539 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00616 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00308 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
visual scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 124 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ac18ff18950e
visual is a skill published in the GitHub repository raven-sourav/pmm-content-engine (3 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,539 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
repo-visuals
Create hero visuals — animated GIF, static PNG, or animated SVG — for GitHub repositories. Runs a structured discovery conversation (scan repo → recommend format → propose creative scenarios → agree on a brief), then designs bespoke HTML/SVG, previews it in the browser, and exports. Use when the user asks for a README…
review-a11y
Internal accessibility review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks the changed user-facing surface for accessibility: semantics, keyboard, focus, contrast, and ARIA correctness — applies only to user-facing surfaces. Findings only…
review-design
Internal UI/UX design review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks the changed UI against the project's design doc: consistency, states, responsiveness, and reuse — applies only when the project has a UI and the change touches it.…
repo-visuals-retro
Retrospective meta-skill for the repo-visuals skill. Reads accumulated evaluation logs from past runs, spots patterns (recurring low-score criteria, repeated iteration failures, unsatisfied requests), consults other expert skills (skill-creator, frontend-design, etc.) where relevant, and proposes concrete edits to…
tasknotes
Manage tasks in an Obsidian TaskNotes vault. Use for creating, reading, updating, or completing tasks; checking what is open or in progress; adding items to a list; marking tasks done or in progress; updating task status or priority; investigating why a task is missing from a view or board; troubleshooting TaskNotes…
readme-doctor
Audit a GitHub repo's README against best-practice patterns and produce a prioritized punch list of fixes. Runs a structured review covering hero presence, install-to-first-success length, "what is this in one sentence" clarity, audience-jargon match, scannability, and drift signals (stale versions, dead links, badge…