Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to RikiGomes/woodpecker-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RikiGomes/woodpecker-mcp/main/.claude/skills/verify/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RikiGomes/woodpecker-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rikigomes/woodpecker-mcp/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rikigomes/woodpecker-mcp/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rikigomes/woodpecker-mcp/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rikigomes/woodpecker-mcp/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rikigomes/woodpecker-mcp/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00442 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00221 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Verifying woodpecker-mcp
The surface is a stdio MCP server. Build, then pipe newline-delimited JSON-RPC into the real bin entry and read stdout (protocol) / stderr (status + warnings).
npm run build # tsc → dist/
# Handshake first, then calls; one JSON object per line:
printf '%s\n' \
'{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"initialize","params":{"protocolVersion":"2024-11-05","capabilities":{},"clientInfo":{"name":"probe","version":"0"}}}' \
'{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"notifications/initialized"}' \
'{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":2,"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"list_instances"}}' \
| env WOODPECKER_URL=https://ci.example.com WOODPECKER_TOKEN=tok node dist/index.js
Flows worth driving:
- Config edge cases: set env pairs (
WOODPECKER_<NAME>_URL/_TOKEN) and watch stderr — incomplete named pairs warn, incomplete/malformed default pair exits 1. - Tool behavior against a fake Woodpecker: a throwaway
node http.createServeron 127.0.0.1 works fine asWOODPECKER_URL(e.g. return HTML with status 200 to exercise the non-JSON body path). tools/listoutput shows the advertised JSON schemas — check them after touchinginputSchemadefinitions.
Gotchas:
- The server keeps running after the piped stdin closes; give it
sleep 1after the last message and kill it, ortail -1the captured stdout. - stdout is protocol-only; all human-readable status goes to stderr.
.env.woodpeckeris loaded from the working directory — run from a temp dir to test that path.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 37 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A c2a836c255f0
verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository RikiGomes/woodpecker-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 442 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
operational-value-designer
Design and verify a deterministic operational-value grader for a GitHub Agentic Workflow. Use for per-run operational value, evidence attribution, maturation, baselines, and operational-value evaluators. Usage: /operational-value-designer OWNER/REPO WORKFLOW-NAME.
squad-conventions
Core conventions and patterns used in the Squad codebase.
deploy
Use when ready to ship — runs pre-push gates (lint, typecheck, build, tests, security sweep), commits, releases, and pushes. Standalone, never auto-invoked. Push always requires explicit confirmation. Trigger with /hyperflow:deploy, "ship it", "ready to push", "release", "cut a release", "deploy".
api-testing
Testing patterns for MCP tool/resource handlers using createMockContext and Vitest. Covers mock context options, handler testing, McpError assertions, format testing, Vitest config setup, and test isolation conventions.
add-test
Scaffold a test file for an existing tool, resource, or service. Use when the user asks to add tests, improve coverage, or when a definition exists without a matching test file.
codspeed-optimize
Autonomously optimize code for performance using CodSpeed benchmarks, flamegraph analysis, and iterative improvement. Use this skill whenever the user wants to make code faster, reduce CPU usage, optimize memory, improve throughput, find performance bottlenecks, or asks to 'optimize', 'speed up', 'make faster'…