Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to rochacbruno/marmite. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rochacbruno/marmite/main/.agents/skills/marmite-development/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rochacbruno/marmiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rochacbruno/marmite/marmite-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rochacbruno/marmite/marmite-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rochacbruno/marmite/marmite-development.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector fail
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
- high Tool Misuse · line 633 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.06584 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.03292 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01317 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00658 |
Grade A, and why
marmite-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 668 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 6cf49416a212
marmite-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository rochacbruno/marmite (873 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 6,584 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
php-development
Expert guidance for PHP 8+ development, prioritizing code quality (SOLID, PSR standards), security practices, and testing requirements.
address-pr-comments-cecil
Standard workflow to address pull request review comments in Cecil. Use when responding to review feedback, fixing requested changes, or preparing a clear reviewer reply with reproduction, fix, tests, and response.
code-review
Review the changed lines of a single file in a pull request for bugs, correctness, error handling, security, and maintainability, and return structured findings.
reconcile-code-review
Reconcile raw specialist findings against the previous bot review and human PR comments to produce a final classified finding list.
review-validation
Validate review findings from specialist agents by reading the actual repo file content and checking each finding for accuracy, applicability, and false positives.
style-guide-review
Review changed MDX/docs files in a pull request against the Cloudflare docs style guide and return structured findings.