Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill arbitration-pleading-draftergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-pleading-drafter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-pleading-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-pleading-drafter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-pleading-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-pleading-drafter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00185 | $0.01780 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00074 | $0.00712 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.00356 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00178 |
Grade A, and why
arbitration-pleading-drafter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Arbitration Pleading Drafter
I am using the Arbitration Pleading Drafter skill from Rohas Legal AI: statement of claim, statement of defence, counterclaim and reply to counterclaim. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
Purpose
Produce a coherent merits pleading — for whichever side and stage is in play — in which every material allegation advances or answers an identified claim, every claim or defence connects to evidence and law, and every item of relief follows from the pleaded case and quantum record.
Before you start
Determine which pleading is being drafted: statement of claim (claimant, opening the merits), statement of defence (respondent, answering a claim, with or without a counterclaim), or reply to counterclaim (claimant, answering a counterclaim pleaded against it). Ask if not stated.
Required inputs (all pleadings)
Obtain the arbitration agreement, complete contract set, notice or request for arbitration, tribunal and institutional details, procedural orders, governing substantive law, factual instructions, source documents, prior correspondence, claimed or disputed heads of loss, calculations, payments, mitigation evidence, and requested relief. For a defence or reply, also obtain the pleading being answered and all its exhibits.
Ask for the filing deadline, page or format limits, status of document production, witness and expert plans, interest basis, currency, tax treatment, whether amendment or reservation of unquantified claims is permitted, whether jurisdiction has already been contested, the required pleading form, and counterclaim fees where relevant.
Do not draft final factual allegations without a source record. Where instructions are incomplete, create an allegation-evidence-gaps table first and use explicit placeholders in the pleading. Do not draft final factual answers without a source record either — the same discipline applies to admissions and denials.
Method — Statement of claim
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 185 tokens per session scan A 4f17adab8703
arbitration-pleading-drafter is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (193 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 185 tokens to every session and 1,780 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
korean-law
A legal research connection to South Korea's official law information service. It can retrieve statutes, court decisions, administrative rules, local ordinances, treaties, and legal interpretations, then check cited provisions against the source.
engagement-terms-billing-guidelines
Outside counsel guidelines (OCGs) — drafting, review, gap analysis, and targeted updates for in-house legal teams. Build new OCGs calibrated to maturity level (light, standard, comprehensive), review existing OCGs against 15-component best practice framework, add or update specific sections (AI policy, AFA terms, D&I…
founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian
A drafting-and-review copilot for a founders' / co-founders' agreement — the terms fixing equity, vesting, IP, roles, control, deadlock, and departure between cofounders. Jurisdiction-agnostic, anchored on the Delaware C-corp default. Two modes: DRAFT (intake → equity & vesting → clauses → blocker triage →…
matter-intake-scoping-scott-margetts
Matter scoping across the full pre-execution arc — organise client data into a structured brief, capture the agreed baseline, or reconstruct scope mid-flight. Use when making sense of client information before a proposal, scoping a new matter, running a kickoff, defining scope, mapping stakeholders, or inheriting a…
ai-governance-reviewer-carl-ditzler
Use this skill when the user wants an AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk review of an internal AI use case, an AI product feature, an LLM workflow, or a third-party AI vendor. The skill asks intake and clarifying questions first when facts or evidence are missing, identifies…
bacen-compliance-sentinel-rafael-mastronardi
Orientação completa sobre conformidade com regulamentações do Banco Central do Brasil: Resolução CMN nº 4.893/2021 (Política de Segurança Cibernética), Resolução BCB nº 85/2021 (GRSIC), Open Finance Brasil (Resoluções BCB nº 32/2020 e atualizações), e demais normas prudenciais do BACEN. Cobre elaboração e revisão de…