secretarial-compliance-checker

secretarial-compliance-checker is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills. It costs 118 tokens per session (1,068 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A checker for the recurring and event-driven company-law duties of an Indian company, including meetings, registers, ownership records, accounts, audits, and filings with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for building a compliance calendar, reviewing filing history and statutory registers, and planning corrections for missed company-law obligations.
Why use it?
It compares what the company was required to do with what its records prove, separating completed, overdue, and unverified work.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: shipped in a Claude Code plugin, but also agents/openai.yaml present.

Part of the rohas-legal-ai plugin — 149 skills shipped together

Good fit It is for building a compliance calendar, reviewing filing history and statutory registers, and planning corrections for missed company-law obligations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/secretarial-compliance-checker
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill secretarial-compliance-checker
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install rohas-legal-ai, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 149 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for secretarial-compliance-checker

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/secretarial-compliance-checker/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/secretarial-compliance-checker)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/secretarial-compliance-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/secretarial-compliance-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for secretarial-compliance-checker

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/secretarial-compliance-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/secretarial-compliance-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 118 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,068 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00118 $0.01068
Opus 5 $0.00059 $0.00534
Sonnet 5 $0.00024 $0.00214
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00107

Measured 9d ago against content hash 585cb74ad3d4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

secretarial-compliance-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/rohas-legal-ai/skills/secretarial-compliance-checker/SKILL.md · 60 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Secretarial Compliance Checker (India)

I am using the Secretarial Compliance Checker skill from Rohas Legal AI: secretarial and filing obligations for a company (India). Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

Purpose

Determine what the particular company was required to do, what the records prove it did, what remains unverified or overdue, and the safest current remediation path.

Required inputs

Obtain:

  • legal name, CIN, incorporation date, registered office, company type, class, status, financial year, share capital, turnover, borrowings, listing and regulated status;
  • constitutional documents, MCA master data, group and ownership chart, directors, KMP, auditors, members, beneficial owners, charges, and subsidiaries;
  • minute books, notices, attendance, resolutions, statutory registers, certificates, financial statements, annual returns, board reports, filing acknowledgements and SRNs;
  • event chronology for appointments, resignations, allotments, transfers, borrowings, charges, office changes, contracts, dividends, deposits, loans, investments, CSR, and other actions; and
  • prior defaults, adjudication, compounding, dormant or strike-off status, regulator correspondence, and professional certificates.

Treat company classification, relevant financial figures, event dates, and primary records as blocking for a complete opinion. Where portal access or evidence is unavailable, label status Not verified rather than compliant.

Method

  1. Retrieve current official sources: Companies Act, applicable rules, exemptions and notifications; MCA form versions, instruction kits and portal requirements; ICSI Secretarial Standards; and SEBI or sector rules where applicable. Record the source and access date.
  2. Build the company profile that drives applicability: private or public, small, one-person, section 8, government, holding, subsidiary, associate, producer, listed, debt-listed, dormant, foreign-controlled, or other relevant class.
  3. Build an obligation universe in three groups:
    • annual or periodic obligations;
    • meeting, register and governance obligations; and
    • event-triggered approvals, filings, disclosures and record updates.
  4. For each obligation, record source, trigger, period, due date formula, approval, form or record, attachments, certification, fee, filing portal, retention, exemption, and evidence supplied.
  5. Recalculate due dates from actual events and financial-year dates. Apply extensions, holidays, transition rules, adjudication orders, and additional-fee periods only from current authority.
  6. Verify performance using primary evidence: signed minutes, registers, filed forms, SRNs, challans, acknowledgement, certificates, master data, and approved financial records. A draft form or internal calendar is not proof of filing.
  7. Reconcile records across cap table, register of members, allotments and transfers, beneficial ownership, director and KMP records, charges, accounts, annual return, board report, auditor records, and MCA data.
  8. Classify each item as Compliant, Overdue, Incomplete, Inconsistent, Not applicable, or Not verified, with evidence and reasoning.
  9. For defects, identify the current remediation route: belated filing, corrected filing, board or shareholder action, register correction, disclosure, adjudication, compounding, condonation, tribunal or court application, or specialist advice. Do not assume ratification cures the original breach.
  10. Prioritise by operational block, director or officer exposure, continuing default, filing dependency, transaction impact, regulator risk, and limitation or rectification deadline.

Read the full file on GitHub · 60 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 60 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A 585cb74ad3d4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

secretarial-compliance-checker is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 1,068 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

regulatory-research-fallback

Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.

HKUDS/OpenSpace · 20 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb

Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 69 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens