tax-assessment-reply-drafter

tax-assessment-reply-drafter is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills. It costs 176 tokens per session (1,045 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A drafting skill for replying to an Indian tax assessment or scrutiny notice before the tax authority has issued an order.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for preparing a factual response to a tax notice and flagging response deadlines or procedural problems in the notice.
Why use it?
It helps organize answers to every question, use the client's real supporting documents, and track deadlines without inventing facts.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: shipped in a Claude Code plugin, but also agents/openai.yaml present.

Part of the rohas-legal-ai plugin — 149 skills shipped together

Good fit It is for preparing a factual response to a tax notice and flagging response deadlines or procedural problems in the notice.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tax-assessment-reply-drafter
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill tax-assessment-reply-drafter
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install rohas-legal-ai, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 149 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for tax-assessment-reply-drafter

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tax-assessment-reply-drafter/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tax-assessment-reply-drafter)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tax-assessment-reply-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tax-assessment-reply-drafter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for tax-assessment-reply-drafter

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tax-assessment-reply-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tax-assessment-reply-drafter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 176 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,045 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00176 $0.01045
Opus 5 $0.00088 $0.00522
Sonnet 5 $0.00035 $0.00209
Haiku 4.5 $0.00018 $0.00104

Measured 9d ago against content hash 50fde7af66ee, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

tax-assessment-reply-drafter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/rohas-legal-ai/skills/tax-assessment-reply-drafter/SKILL.md · 65 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Tax Assessment Reply Drafter

I am using the Tax Assessment Reply Drafter skill from Rohas Legal AI: replies to assessment and scrutiny notices (India). Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

What this does

Drafts a reply to a tax assessment or scrutiny notice issued before any order has been passed — addressing every query the notice raises, referencing the client's own supporting documents, and keeping a factual, cooperative tone appropriate to a fact-gathering stage rather than an adversarial one. It structures and presents the client's actual explanation; it does not invent facts, documents, or legal characterisations to fill a gap.

Before you start

The notice itself. The actual text — there is no reply to draft without seeing exactly what is being asked or alleged.

The client's actual explanation and supporting facts, from the client. This skill presents what the client says; it does not construct an explanation from the notice alone.

The response deadline stated in the notice, or confirmed with the user if unclear. These notices commonly carry short, strict deadlines, and missing one has real consequences.

Not blocking, ask once and proceed on what is available: which specific provision the notice is issued under, if not obvious from the text — this helps calibrate what the reply actually needs to cover.

Method

1. Read the whole notice once before drafting anything. A global point — the notice period is too short, or a query lacks the particularity the law requires — can apply across several queries at once, and drafting query by query on a first pass misses this.

2. List every query or point raised in the notice, numbered, before drafting any response.

3. For each query, state the client's explanation precisely, using only what the client has actually provided. Do not invent a supporting fact or document to make a response feel more complete.

4. Reference the specific documents being submitted in support of each response, and flag any document referred to but not yet available.

Read the full file on GitHub · 65 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 65 lines · 176 tokens per session scan A 50fde7af66ee

Subscribe to this mod's changes

tax-assessment-reply-drafter is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 176 tokens to every session and 1,045 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

regulatory-research-fallback

Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.

HKUDS/OpenSpace · 20 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb

Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 69 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens