Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill written-statement-draftergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/written-statement-drafter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/written-statement-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/written-statement-drafter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/written-statement-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/written-statement-drafter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.00712 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00285 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
written-statement-drafter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 43 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Written Statement Drafter
I am using the Written Statement Drafter skill from Rohas Legal AI: civil and commercial defences with specific admissions, denials and affirmative case (India). Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
Jurisdiction gate
This skill applies Indian law and procedure only. Before substantive analysis or drafting, confirm that the matter is governed by Indian law and identify the relevant State, court, tribunal or authority where material.
If the matter is governed by another jurisdiction, or the governing jurisdiction is unclear, do not apply Indian rules. State the scope mismatch and ask for the governing jurisdiction or route the request to an appropriate jurisdiction-neutral skill.
Required inputs
Obtain the complete plaint and annexures, summons and service date, orders and deadline, defendant's paragraph-by-paragraph instructions, defence documents, chronology, jurisdiction and limitation facts, proposed preliminary objections, admissions that can properly be made, set-off or counterclaim instructions, related proceedings, and the proposed court and State.
The plaint, service and deadline record, represented defendant, paragraph instructions and core defence evidence are blocking. Do not draft generic denials to fill an evidentiary gap.
Method
- Retrieve the current Code of Civil Procedure, 1908—especially Order VIII and applicable provisions on pleadings—the Limitation Act, the Commercial Courts Act where relevant, State amendments, local rules and current controlling authority on any deadline or procedural dispute.
- Calculate the response deadline and identify whether extension, condonation or forfeiture risk arises. Distinguish ordinary and commercial-suit regimes and do not transpose one timeline into the other.
- Test maintainability, jurisdiction, limitation, party defects, statutory bars, arbitration or forum clauses, preconditions and prior proceedings without waiving a defence inadvertently.
- Answer every material plaint allegation specifically: admit, deny with the defendant's affirmative account, require proof where properly available, or state inability to admit for an identified reason. Avoid evasive or omnibus denials.
- Plead the defence's positive factual case chronologically and map it to documents. Keep inconsistent alternatives explicit and legally permissible.
- Analyse set-off and counterclaim separately for cause of action, parties, jurisdiction, valuation, court fee and limitation. Do not add one merely because the defendant has a grievance.
- Prepare verification, affidavit or statement of truth, admission-denial of documents, disclosure and filing materials required by the forum.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 43 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 5c1252ee10c0
written-statement-drafter is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (149 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 712 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.
Other skills, from other repositories
lawyer-expert
Expert-level legal systems, contracts, compliance, and legal technology. Use when the user mentions legal, contracts, compliance, law, or legal tech, or when the task involves Legal Systems, Legal Technology, Compliance Frameworks, or Contract Management.
law-to-markdown
A skill that converts legal provisions and regulatory documents from plain text, PDF, or Word format into Markdown. Markdown is a plain-text format commonly used for structured documents.
federal-court-rules
Use when an agent needs to look up, quote, summarize, cite, or reason from bundled federal court rules, including the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Federal Rules of Evidence, supplemental rules, selected federal district local rules, and selected ECF rules. Provides local…
ma-laws
Use when an agent needs to look up, quote, search, summarize, cite, or reason from the Massachusetts Constitution, Massachusetts General Laws, or Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure.
assistant-juridique-fr
Assistant juridique expert en droit français. Recherches, consultations, rédaction d'actes, contre-argumentaires, analyses de contrats et de pièces, veille, vérification et harmonisation de références. Produit des documents Word (computer use) ou des réponses conversationnelles structurées. MCP : OpenLegi, Themia…
invoice-review-compliance
Invoice review, non-compliance flagging, rejection communication, billing trend analysis, and conversation preparation for in-house legal ops teams managing outside counsel. Review invoices against billing guidelines; flag block billing, prohibited fees, rate violations, staffing violations, late submission. Produce…