Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill written-submissions-draftergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/written-submissions-drafter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/written-submissions-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/written-submissions-drafter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/written-submissions-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/written-submissions-drafter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00602 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00241 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00120 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
written-submissions-drafter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Written Submissions Drafter
I am using the Written Submissions Drafter skill from Rohas Legal AI: issue-led, authority-verified and record-linked written advocacy. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
Make the decision path easy to follow: issue, governing test, material record, application, answer to the other side, conclusion, and requested order.
Intake
Obtain the forum and hearing type, issues or questions presented, pleadings, orders, evidence and transcript, agreed facts, record or bundle index, opponent's case, current authorities and subsequent treatment, procedural rules, page and time limits, citation style, oral plan, and exact relief.
Drafting method
- Confirm the live issues, burdens, standard, jurisdiction, procedural posture, and matters already decided, agreed, abandoned, or outside scope.
- Draft a short overview stating the result sought and the decisive reasons without overstating facts or law.
- Organise by issue rather than document sequence or witness.
- For each issue, state the controlling rule with accurate authority and pinpoint; then identify the material facts with record locators.
- Apply the rule to the facts and explain each inferential step. Distinguish evidence, finding, concession, allegation, and submission.
- Address adverse facts, contrary authority, jurisdictional differences, standard-of-review constraints, and the opponent's strongest argument fairly.
- Explain why cited cases are binding or persuasive, factually analogous or distinguishable, and still good law at the research date.
- Avoid unnecessary quotation, string citations, repetition, rhetoric, and propositions broader than the authority supports.
- Tie every requested remedy, interest, costs, stay, direction, timetable, or consequential order to power and supporting facts.
- Reconcile the submissions with pleadings, evidence, prior positions, oral argument, chronology, authorities list, and draft order.
- Conform to current formatting, certification, hypertext, bundle, filing, service, confidentiality, and page-limit requirements.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 59 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A e35820f492a4
written-submissions-drafter is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (204 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 602 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.
written-submissions-drafter compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| written-submissions-drafterrohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills | Skill | 204 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code, Codex |
| korean-lawchrisryugj/korean-law-mcp | Skill | 2.9k | 7d ago | MIT | A | 85 | Claude Code |
| engagement-terms-billing-guidelineslawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills | Skill | 939 | 21d ago | none | A | 180 | Claude Code, Codex |
| founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossianlawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills | Skill | 939 | 21d ago | none | A | 194 | Claude Code |
| matter-intake-scoping-scott-margettslawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills | Skill | 939 | 21d ago | none | A | 145 | Claude Code, Codex |
| ai-governance-reviewer-carl-ditzlerlawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills | Skill | 939 | 21d ago | none | A | 121 | Claude Code, Codex |
| bacen-compliance-sentinel-rafael-mastronardilawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills | Skill | 939 | 21d ago | none | A | 252 | Claude Code, Codex |