Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/rpamis/comet/brainstormingnpx skills add rpamis/comet --skill brainstorminggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rpamis/cometWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00037 | $0.02220 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01110 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00444 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00222 |
Grade A, and why
brainstorming scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- brainstorming — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- brainstorming — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- brainstorming — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- brainstorming — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- brainstorming — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- brainstorming — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- brainstorming — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- brainstorming — 97% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs
Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue.
Start by understanding the current project context, then ask questions one at a time to refine the idea. Once you understand what you're building, present the design and get user approval.
Anti-Pattern: "This Is Too Simple To Need A Design"
Every project goes through this process. A todo list, a single-function utility, a config change — all of them. "Simple" projects are where unexamined assumptions cause the most wasted work. The design can be short (a few sentences for truly simple projects), but you MUST present it and get approval.
Checklist
You MUST create a task for each of these items and complete them in order:
- Explore project context — check files, docs, recent commits
- Offer the visual companion just-in-time — NOT upfront. The first time a question would genuinely be clearer shown than described, offer it then (its own message); on approval its browser tab opens for you. If no visual question ever arises, never offer it. See the Visual Companion section below.
- Ask clarifying questions — one at a time, understand purpose/constraints/success criteria
- Propose 2-3 approaches — with trade-offs and your recommendation
- Present design — in sections scaled to their complexity, get user approval after each section
- Write design doc — save to
docs/superpowers/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.mdand commit - Spec self-review — quick inline check for placeholders, contradictions, ambiguity, scope (see below)
- User reviews written spec — ask user to review the spec file before proceeding
- Transition to implementation — invoke writing-plans skill to create implementation plan
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 160 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A e14914605f64
brainstorming is a skill published in the GitHub repository rpamis/comet (2,871 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 2,220 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
evaluator-write-final
Internal Auto-Harness evaluator skill for final QA report aggregation. Use only inside the Evaluator subagent during final mode.
generator-apply-fixes
Internal Auto-Harness generator skill for QA fix cycles. Use only inside the Generator subagent when it is addressing named defects from QA or retest.
generator-draft-contract
Internal Auto-Harness generator skill for sprint contract drafting. Use only inside the Generator subagent when it is producing or revising the current sprint contract.
planner-spec-draft-parallel
Internal Auto-Harness planning skill for parallel spec and design-direction drafting. Use only inside the Planner subagent when it is updating intake.md and producing spec.md plus design-direction.md under .harness-parallel.
planner-spec-draft
Internal Auto-Harness planning skill for spec and design-direction drafting. Use only inside the Planner subagent when it is updating intake.md and producing spec.md plus design-direction.md.
planner-clarify-parallel
Internal Auto-Harness planning skill for parallel clarification intake. Use only inside the Planner subagent when it is producing .harness-parallel/intake.md and .harness-parallel/status.md.