Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ruizrica/agent-pi --skill autoresearchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ruizrica/agent-piWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ruizrica/agent-pi/autoresearch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ruizrica/agent-pi/autoresearch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ruizrica/agent-pi/autoresearch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ruizrica/agent-pi/autoresearch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ruizrica/agent-pi/autoresearch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 54 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 265 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.03061 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.01530 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00612 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00306 |
Grade A, and why
autoresearch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 281 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Autoresearch — Autonomous Goal-directed Iteration
Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. Applies constraint-driven autonomous iteration to ANY work — not just ML research.
Core idea: You are an autonomous agent. Modify -> Verify -> Keep/Discard -> Repeat.
When to Activate
- User invokes
/skill:autoresearchor/autoresearch - User says "work autonomously", "iterate until done", "keep improving", "run overnight"
- Any task requiring repeated iteration cycles with measurable outcomes
Phase 1: Understand (Do This First — Before ANY Work)
Before touching any files, deeply understand the goal. Do NOT rush into iteration.
-
Read relevant files — Scan the codebase to build context around the user's goal. Understand what exists, what patterns are in use, and what's realistic.
-
Identify ambiguities — Based on the goal and codebase context, what's unclear?
- Is the success metric obvious or ambiguous?
- Is the scope (which files to modify) clear?
- Are there constraints the user hasn't mentioned?
- Are there multiple valid interpretations?
-
Ask clarifying questions — If ANY ambiguity exists, use
ask_userto ask targeted questions:ask_user { question: "I have a few questions before I build the research plan:", mode: "questions", options: [ { label: "1. What metric should define success? (e.g. test coverage %, build time ms, bundle size KB)" }, { label: "2. Which files/directories are in scope for modification?" }, { label: "3. Are there any approaches to avoid or constraints I should know about?" }, { label: "4. What does 'done' look like — a specific target, or iterate until interrupted?" } ] }Tailor questions to the specific goal. Don't ask about what's already clear. Ask about genuine ambiguities.
-
Skip if crystal clear — If the goal is unambiguous (clear metric, scope, exit criteria), skip questions and proceed to Phase 2. State briefly why no questions are needed.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 281 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 576a08c16f23
autoresearch is a skill published in the GitHub repository ruizrica/agent-pi (266 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 3,061 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.