Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add saadshahd/moo.md --skill complaingit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saadshahd/moo.mdWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saadshahd/moo.md/complain)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saadshahd/moo.md/complain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saadshahd/moo.md/complain/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saadshahd/moo.md/complain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saadshahd/moo.md/complain.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.00214 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00086 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
complain scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Judge by your own standard, not by what the user hopes to hear.
A suggestion is something you kept to yourself that would change the user's next decision. It rests on what you saw in this session, never a guess. Anything you or the session already said is not one, including a suggestion in an earlier card: the band keeps those, so a card holds only new ones.
Each is one line with one cause: the problem, then → what you would do. Keep the reasoning until the user asks.
End the reply with them as a card, never in its text, and carry on with the task:
```card
{"suggestions":["…"]}
```
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed 22f452b00b95
- 2d ago First seen · 19 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A a9dce3e8d47f
complain is a skill published in the GitHub repository saadshahd/moo.md (38 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 214 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-22.
Other skills, from other repositories
lark-workflow-standup-report
A Feishu (Lark) workflow that combines calendar events with unfinished tasks into a daily schedule summary. Feishu is a workplace collaboration app with calendar and task features.
lark-attendance
A tool for checking an employee's own Feishu attendance and clock-in records. Feishu is a workplace collaboration platform that also provides work-time tracking.
lark-im
A tool for using Feishu instant messaging and group chats. It works with messages, replies, threads, files, reactions, bookmarks, members, and interactive message cards.
lark-workflow-meeting-summary
A workflow for collecting meeting records from a chosen period and producing a structured summary, using Lark's meeting and document services.
lark-drive
A Lark cloud-storage management skill. Lark cloud storage is the service's online space for files and folders, similar to a shared drive.
lark-contact
A Lark directory lookup skill. Lark is a workplace collaboration platform, and this skill resolves names or email addresses to user IDs and looks up details for known IDs, including bots and agents.